ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 7 of 76, ordered by
129. Ghannam, M.T., and M.N. Esmail, “The effect of pre-wetting on dynamic contact angle,” Canadian J. Chemical Engineering, 70, 408-412, (1992).
354. Stradal, M., and D.A.I. Goring, “Corona-induced autohesion of polyethylene: Dependence of bonding on frequency and power consumption in various gases,” Canadian J. Chemical Engineering, 53, 427-430, (1975).
1311. Kwok, D.Y., and A.W. Neumann, “A simple experimental test of the Lifshitz-van der Waals/acid-bsae approach to determine interfacial tensions,” Canadian J. Chemical Engineering, 74, 551-553, (1996).
2817. Dilsiz, N., and J.P. Wightman, “Surface analysis of unsized and sized carbon fibers,” Carbon, 37, 1105-1114, (1999).
726. Blake, T.D., and K.J. Ruschak, “Wetting: static and dynamic contact lines,” in Liquid Film Coating: Scientific Principles and Their Technological Implications, Kistler, S.F., and P.M. Schweizer, eds., 63-98, Chapman & Hall, Jan 1997.
727. Tricot, Y.-M., “Surfactants: static and dynamic surface tension,” in Liquid Film Coating: Scientific Principles and Their Technological Implications, Kistler, S.F., and P.M. Schweizer, eds., 99-136, Chapman & Hall, Jan 1997.
411. no author cited, “Technique for seeing polymer surface is validated,” Chemical & Engineering News, 78, 45, (Nov 2000).
380. Weber, J.H., “Predict surface tension of binary liquids,” Chemical Engineering, 92, 87-90, (Oct 1985).
373. van Oss, C.J., M.K. Chaudhury, and R.J. Good, “Interfacial Lifschitz-van der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems,” Chemical Review, 88, 927-941, (1988).
932. Bradley, A., and J.D. Fales, “Prospects for industrial applications of electrical discharge,” Chemical Technology, 1, 232-237, (Apr 1971).
2480. Mausar, J., “Surface energy and surface tension: Measurements key to ink, adhesive, and coating wet out,” Chemsultants International, Oct 2010.
908. no author cited, “Surface tension of inks and paper; project 2695-26,” Chesapeake Packaging Co., 1997.
2134. no author cited, “The gentle art of pretreating,” Coating, 20-24, (Jan 2007).
1577. Palmers, J., “Roll-to-roll plasma treater to improve bonding and modify surfaces,” Coating Magazine, 469, (Dec 2000).
2996. Abdel-Fateh, E., and M. Alshaer, “Polyimide surface modification using He-H2O atmospheric pressure plasma jet-discharge power effect,” Coatings, 10, (Jul 2020).
The atmospheric pressure He- H 2 O plasma jet has been analyzed and its effects on the Kapton polyimide surface have been investigated in terms of discharge power effect. The polyimide surfaces before and after plasma treatment were characterized using atomic force microscopy (AFM), X-ray photoelectrons spectroscopy (XPS) and contact angle. The results showed that, increasing the discharge power induces remarkable changes on the emission intensity, rotational and vibrational temperatures of He- H 2 O plasma jet. At the low discharge power ≤5.2 W, the contact angle analysis of the polyimide surface remarkably decrease owing to the abundant hydrophilic polar C=O and N–C=O groups as well as increase of surface roughness. Yet, plasma treatment at high discharge power ≥5.2 W results in a slight decrease of the surface wettability together with a reduction in the surface roughness and polar groups concentrations.
2633. Mills, P., and A. Stecher, “Overcoming adhesion failures of UV coatings with atmospheric plasma treatment,” Coatings World, 20, 68-71, (Oct 2015).
2651. Mania, D.M., “Is there a correlation between contact angle and stain repellency?,” Coatings World, 21, 99-105, (Jul 2016).
2739. Banton, R., B. Casey, C. Maus, and M. Carroll, “Adhesion promotion for UV coatings and inks onto difficult plastic substrates,” Coatings World, 23, 78-84, (Jul 2018).
2646. Schoff, C.K., “Application defects,” CoatingsTech, 13, 32-39, (Apr 2016).
13. Banerji, B.K., “Physical significance of contact angles,” Colloid and Polymer Science, 259, 391-394, (1981).
227. Lunkenheimer, K., and K.D. Wandtke, “Determination of the surface tension of surfactant solutions applying the method of Lecomte de Nouy (ring tensiometer),” Colloid and Polymer Science, 259, 354-366, (1981).
286. Pennings, J.F.M., and B. Bosman, “Relaxation of the surface energy of solid polymers,” Colloid and Polymer Science, 257, 720-724, (1979).
1302. Li, D., and A.W. Neumann, “Surface heterogeneity and contact angle hysteresis,” Colloid and Polymer Science, 270, 495-504, (1992).
1307. Moy, E., F.Y.H. Lin, Z. Policova, and A.W. Neumann, “Contact angle studies of the surface properties of covalently bonded poly-L-lysine to surfaces treated by glow-discharge,” Colloid and Polymer Science, 272, 1245-1251, (1994).
1316. Kwok, D.Y., A. Leung, A. Li, C.N.C. Lam, R. Wu, and A.W. Neumann, “Low-rate dynamic contact angles on poly(n-butyl methacrylate) and the determination of solid surface tensions,” Colloid and Polymer Science, 276, 459-469, (1998).
1829. Tagawa, M., K. Gotoh, A. Yasukawa, and M. Ikuta, “Estimation of surface free energies and Hamaker constants for fibrous solids by wetting force measurements,” Colloid and Polymer Science, 268, 589-594, (Jun 1990).
1830. Tagawa, M., N. Ohmae, M. Umeno, K. Gotoh, and A. Yasukawa, “Contact angle hysteresis in carbon fibers studied by wetting force measurements,” Colloid and Polymer Science, 267, 702-706, (Aug 1989).
2047. Tsuchida, M., and Z. Osawa, “Effect of ageing atmospheres on the changes in surface free energies of oxygen plasma-treated polyethylene films,” Colloid and Polymer Science, 272, 770-776, (Jul 1994).
2512. Drnovska, L.L. Jr., V. Bursikova, J. Zemek, and A.M. Barros-Timmons, “Surface properties of polyethylene after low-temperature plasma treatment,” Colloid and Polymer Science, 281, 1025-1033, (Oct 2003).
589. Vavruch, I., “On the relation between surface energy, internal pressure and molar volume in pure fluids,” Colloids and Surfaces, 30, 405+, (1988).
1327. Li, D., and A.W. Neumann, “Determination of line tension from the drop size dependence of contact angles,” Colloids and Surfaces, 43, 195-206, (1990).
1329. Moy, E., P. Cheng, Z. Policova, S. Treppo, D. Kwok, D.R. Mack, et al, “Measurement of contact angles from the maximum diameter of non wetting drops by means of a modified axisymmetric drop shape analysis,” Colloids and Surfaces, 58, 215-227, (1991).
2115. Busscher, H.J., A.W.J. van Pelt, P. de Boer, H.P. de Long, and J. Arends, “The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids,” Colloids and Surfaces, 9, 319-331, (May 1984).
2283. Spelt, J.K., “Solid surface tension: The use of thermodynamic models to verify its determination from contact angles,” Colloids and Surfaces, 43, 389-411, (1990).
1294. Kwok, D.Y., C.N.C. Lam, A. Li, A. Leung, R. Wu, E. Mok, and A.W. Neumann, “Measuring and interpreting contact angles: A complex issue,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 142, 219-235, (1998).
1305. Kwok, D.Y., D. Li, and A.W. Neumann, “Fowkes' surface tension components approach revisited,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 89, 181-191, (1994).
1325. Kwok, D.Y., and A.W. Neumann, “Contact angle interpretation in terms of solid surface tension,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 161, 31-48, (2000).
1385. Tusek, L., M. Nitschke, C. Werner, K. Stana-Kleinschek, V. Ribitsch, “Surface characterization of NH3 plasma treated polyamide 6 foils,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 195, 81-95, (Dec 2001).
1641. Szymczyk, K., A. Zdziennicka, J. Krawczyk, and B. Janczuk, “Wettability, adhesion, adsorption and interface tension in the polymer/surfactant aqueous solution system I: Critical surface tension of polymer wetting and its surface tension,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 402, 132-138, (May 2012).
The contact angle of aqueous solutions of Triton X-100, Triton X-114, Triton X-165, sodium dodecylsulfate, sodium hexadecylsulfonate, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, cetylpyridinium bromide, sodium N-lauryl sarcosinate, dodecyldimethyethylammonium bromide, tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide and benzyldimethyldodecylammonium bromide on polytetrafluoroethylene, polymethyl methacrylate and nylon 6 was studied. The contact angle values were used in the Young equation for the polymer–solution interface tension calculation and for the determination of the critical surface tension of polymer wetting. The critical surface tension of polymer wetting was obtained on the basis of the relationship between the cosine of contact angle and/or the adhesion tension as a function of the surface tension of aqueous solution of studied surfactants and then was discussed in relation to the Lifshitz–van der Waals components and electron-acceptor and electron-donor parameters of polytetrafluoroethylene, polymethyl methacrylate and nylon 6 surface tension. The role of the parameter of interfacial interactions in the relationship between the critical surface tension of polymer wetting and the surface tension was also considered. This parameter was calculated by using the polymer–solution interface tension as well as the polymer and aqueous solutions of surfactant surface tension.
1698. Kwok, D.Y., “The usefulness of the Lifshitz-van der Waals/acid-base approach for surface tension components and interfacial tensions,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 156, 191-200, (1999).
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->