ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 68 of 76, ordered by
846. Friedrich, J., G. Kuhn, R. Mix, I. Retzko, V. Gerstung, St. Weidner, R.-D. Schul, “Plasma polymer adhesion promoters for metal-polymer systems,” in Polyimides and Other High Temperature Polymers: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications, Vol. 2, Mittal, K.L., ed., 359-388, VSP, Jun 2003.
847. Iwamori, S., N. Yanagawa, M. Sadamoto, R. Nara, and S. Nakahara, “RF plasma etching of a polyimide film with oxygen mixed with nitrogen trifluoride,” in Polyimides and Other High Temperature Polymers: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications, Vol. 2, Mittal, K.L., ed., 407-418, VSP, Jun 2003.
848. Wang, Y., and S. Rak, “Surface modification of polyphenylene sulfide plastics to improve their adhesion to a dielectric adhesive,” in Adhesion Aspects of Polymeric Coatings, Vol. 2, Mittal, K.L., ed., 121-136, VSP, Jun 2003.
1089. Qiu, Y., X. Shao, C. Jensen, Y.J. Hwang, C. Zhang, and M.G. McCord, “The effects of atmospheric pressure plasma treatments on adhesion and mechanical properties of high-performance fibers for composites,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 3-24, VSP, Sep 2004.
1090. Tanaka, T., M. Yoshida, M. Shinohara, S. Watanabe, and T. Takagi, “Surface modification of PET films by plasma source ion implantation,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 69-82, VSP, Sep 2004.
1091. Gotoh, K., “Wettability and surface free energies of polymeric materials exposed to excimer ultraviolet light and particle deposition onto their surfaces in water,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 125-138, VSP, Sep 2004.
1092. Desai, H., L. Xiaolu, A. Entenberg, B. Kahn, F.D. Egitto, L.J. Matienzo, et al, “Adhesion of copper to poly(tetrafluoroethylene) surfaces modified with vacuum UV radiation downstream from He and Ar microwave plasmas,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 139-158, VSP, Sep 2004.
1093. Zeng, J., and A.N. Netravali, “KrF excimer laser surface modification of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene fibers for improved adhesion to epoxy resins,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 159-182, VSP, Sep 2004.
1094. Sancaktar, E., and N. Sunthonpagasit, “Surface modification of polypropylene for improved adhesion,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 285-324, VSP, Sep 2004.
1095. Kwok, D.Y., and A.W. Neumann, “Contact angle measurements and criteria for surface energetic interpretation,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 117-160, VSP, Nov 2003.
1096. Extrand, C.W., “A thermodynamic model for wetting free energies of solids from contact angles,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 211-218, VSP, Nov 2003.
1097. Etzler, F.M., “Characterization of surface free energies and surface chemistry of solids,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 219-266, VSP, Nov 2003.
1098. Schrader, M.E., “Effect of adsorbed vapor on liquid-solid adhesion,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 67-94, VSP, Nov 2003.
1099. Barthwal, S.K., A.K. Panwar, and S. Ray, “Dynamic evolution of contact angle on solid substrates during evaporation,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 175-190, VSP, Nov 2003.
1186. Cho, J.S., S. Han, K.H. Kim, Y.G. Han, J.H. Lee, et al, “Surface modification of polymers by ion-assisted reactions: An overview,” in Adhesion Aspects of Thin Films, Vol. 2, Mittall, K.L., ed., 105-121, VSP, May 2006.
1418. Zhang, J., and D.Y. Kwok, “Study of contact angles, contact line dynamics and interfacial liquid slip by a mean-field free-energy lattice Boltzmann model,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 3-28, VSP, Jul 2006.
1419. Callegari, G., A. Calvo, and J.P. Hulin, “Contact line motion: Hydrodynamical or molecular process?,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 29-41, VSP, Jul 2006.
1420. Combellas, C., A. Fuchs, F. Kanoufi, and M.E.R. Shanahan, “The detailed structure of a perturbed wetting triple line on modified PTFE,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 43-59, VSP, Jul 2006.
1421. Muszynski, L., D. Baptista, and D.J. Gardner, “A simple geometrical model to predict evaporative behavior of spherical sessile droplets on impermeable surfaces,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 61-76, VSP, Jul 2006.
1422. Della Volpe, C., M. Brugnara, D. Maniglio, S. Siboni, and T. Wangdu, “About the possibility of experimentally measuring an equilibrium contact angle and its theoretical and practical consequences,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 79-99, VSP, Jul 2006.
1423. Kamusewitz, H., and W. Possart, “The static contact angle hysteresis and Young's equilibrium contact angle,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 101-114, VSP, Jul 2006.
1424. Etzler, F.M., “Surface free energy of solids: A comparison of models,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 215-236, VSP, Jul 2006.
1425. Molina, R., E. Bertran, M.R. Julia, and P. Erra, “Wettability of surface-modified keratin fibers,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 321-333, VSP, Jul 2006.
1426. Johansson, K.S., “Ammonia plasma-simulating treatments and their impact on wettability of PET fabrics,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 335-350, VSP, Jul 2006.
1427. Zeng, J., and A.N. Netravali, “XeCl excimer laser treatment of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene fibers,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 407-436, VSP, Jul 2006.
1559. Grace, J., H.K. Zhuang, and L. Gerenser, “Importance of process conditions in polymer surface modification: a critical assessment,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 3-24, VSP, May 2007.
1560. Lommatzsch, U., M. Noeske, J. Degenhart, T. Wubben, S. Strudthoff, et al, “Pretreatment and surface modification of polymers via atmospheric-pressure plasma jet treatment,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 25-32, VSP, May 2007.
1561. Kobayashi, T., and H. Kumagai, “Surface modification of polymers by ozone: Comparison of polyethylene and polystyrene treated at different temperatures,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 113-125, VSP, May 2007.
1591. Finstad, C., J. Madocks, P. Morse, and P. Marcus, “Surface treatment of plastic substrates for improved adhesion of thin metal films through ion bombardment by an anode layer ion source,” in Adhesion Aspects of Thin Films, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 221-233, VSP, Sep 2007.
1592. Zekonyte, J., V. Zaporojtchenko, and F. Faupel, “Tailoring of thermoplastic polymer surfaces with low energy ions: Relevance to growth and adhesion of Cu,” in Adhesion Aspects of Thin Films, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 235-262, VSP, Sep 2007.
1642. Shanahan, M.E.R., “Effects of surface flaws on the wettability of solids,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Robert J. Good, Mittal, K.L., ed., 159-171, VSP, Nov 1993.
1643. Hazlett, R.D., “On surface roughness effects in wetting phenomena,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Robert J. Good, Mittal, K.L., ed., 173-181, VSP, Nov 1993.
1750. Jensen, W.B., “The Lewis acid-base concepts: recent results and prospects for the future,” in Acid-Base Interactions: Relevance to Adhesion Science and Technology, Mittal, K.L., ed., 3-24, VSP, Nov 1991.
1386. Wagner, H.E., R. Brandenburg, K.V. Kozlov, A. Sonnenfeld, P. Michel, J.F. Behnke, “The barrier discharge: Basic properties and applications to surface treatment,” Vacuum, 3, 417-436, (May 2003).
1588. Kersten, H., H. Deutsch, H. Steffan, G.M.W. Kroesen, and R. Hippler, “The energy balance at substrate surfaces during plasma processing,” Vacuum, 63, 385-431, (2001).
1766. Mesyats, G., Y. Klyachkin, N. Gavrilov, and A. Kondyurin, “Adhesion of polytetrafluoroethylene modified by an ion beam,” Vacuum, 52, 285-289, (1999).
2502. Bardos, L, and H. Barankova, “Plasma processes at atmospheric and low pressures,” Vacuum, 83, 522-527, (Oct 2006).
In the last few decades there has been an intense development in non-equilibrium (“cold”) plasma surface processing systems at atmospheric pressure. This new trend is stimulated mainly to decrease equipment costs by avoiding expensive pumping systems of conventional low-pressure plasma devices. This work summarizes physical and practical limitations where atmospheric plasmas cannot compete with low-pressure plasma and vice-versa. As the processing conditions for atmospheric plasma are rather different from reduced pressure systems in many cases these conditions may increase final equipment costs substantially. In this work we briefly review the main principles, advantages and drawbacks of atmospheric plasma for a better understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the atmospheric plasma processing technology compared with conventional low-pressure plasma processing.
2985. Vesel, A., and M. Mozetic, “Surface modification and ageing of PMMA polymer by oxygen plasma treatment,” Vacuum, 86, 634-637, (Jan 2012).
We present a study on ageing of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) polymer treated with oxygen plasma. Oxygen plasma was created with an RF generator operating at a frequency of 27.12 MHz and a power of 200 W. The oxygen pressure was 75 Pa. The samples were treated for different time from 5 s to 60 s. The chemical modifications of the surface after plasma treatment were monitored by XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy), while the wettability and ageing effects were studied by WCA (water contact angle measurements). The samples were aged in dry air or in water. In the case of dry air, the least pronounced ageing was observed for the sample treated for 60 s. For samples aged in water, however, the lowest ageing rate was observed for the sample treated for 5 s. The samples were ageing slightly faster in water than in air. We also investigated the temperature effect on ageing of plasma treated samples. A set of samples was stored in a refrigerator at 5 °C and the other set was placed into an oven at 50 °C. The ageing rate of the samples stored at 5 °C was significantly lower than for the samples stored at 50 °C, so cooling the samples help keeping the required surface properties.An atmospheric pressure plasma syste
2636. Eisby, J., “Corona treatment,” Vetaphone (http://www.vetaphone.com/technology/corona-treatment/),
2953. Eisby, J., “It's all about shelf life!,” Vetaphone (https://www.vetaphone.com/its-all-about-shelf-life), Apr 2022.
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->