ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 53 of 76, ordered by
332. Sharp, K.A., A. Nichols, R.F. Fine, and B. Honig, “Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects,” Science, 252, 106-109, (Apr 1989).
454. Dorsey, N.E., “Ring methods for surface tension measurement,” Science, 69, 189+, (1929).
1117. Ryu, D.Y., K. Shin, E. Drockenmuller, C.J. Hawker, and T.P. Russell, “A generalized approach to the modification of solid surfaces,” Science, 308, 236-238, (Apr 2005).
Interfacial interactions underpin phenomena ranging from adhesion to surface wetting. Here, we describe a simple, rapid, and robust approach to modifying solid surfaces, based on an ultrathin cross-linkable film of a random copolymer, which does not rely on specific surface chemistries. Specifically, thin films of benzocyclobutene-functionalized random copolymers of styrene and methyl methacrylate were spin coated or transferred, then thermally cross-linked on a wide variety of metal, metal oxide, semiconductor, and polymeric surfaces, producing a coating with a controlled thickness and well-defined surface energy. The process described can be easily implemented and adapted to other systems.
2793. Lin, K., M. Vuckovac, M. Latikka, T. Huhtamiiki, and R.H.A. Ras, “Improving surface-wetting characterization,” Science, 363, 1147-1148, (Mar 2019).
Highly hydrophobic surfaces have numerous useful properties; for example, they can shed water, be self-cleaning, and prevent fogging (1, 2). Surface hydrophobicity is generally characterized with contact angle (CA) goniometry. With a history of more than 200 years (3), the measurement of CAs was and still is considered the gold standard in wettability characterization, serving to benchmark surfaces across the entire wettability spectrum from superhydrophilic (CA of 0°) to superhydrophobic (CA of 150° to 180°). However, apart from a few reports [e.g., (4–8)], the inherent measurement inaccuracy of the CA goniometer has been largely overlooked by its users. The development of next-generation liquid-repellent coatings depends on raising awareness of the limitations of CA measurements and adopting more sensitive methods that measure forces.
2997. Riyanto, E., “Surface treatment of polyimide using atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge plasma,” ScienceAsia, 46, 444-449, (2020).
In this study, polyimide was treated by atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge plasma using a helium and/or helium-oxygen mixture gasses. The polyimide was placed between copper electrodes with dielectric material installed on the cathode electrode. To investigate the surface treatment, the plasmas as a function of power, treatment time, and plasma gasses were introduced on the polyimide substrate. The experimental results show that the polyimide treated by dielectric barrier discharge plasma increases the wetting property. This property can be attributed to the surface roughness and the water compatible functional groups. The roughness increases by helium plasma treatment and can be further improved by increasing plasma power or the presence of oxygen in the helium-oxygen mixture plasma. On the other hand, the plasma surface treatment led to formation of oxygen related functional groups of -C=O and -OH.
345. Smith, R.E., “UV inks + plastics = web/treater combo,” Screen Graphics, 4, 56-63, (Jul 1998).
926. Pennance, J.R., “Printing on plastic films: problems with surface tension,” Screen Printing, 73, 108-109, (Jun 1983).
7. Agler, S., “Are your bottles print ready?Understanding treatments for surface tension,” ScreenPrinting, 84, 100, (Jan 1994).
133. Gilleo, K.B., “Rheology and surface chemistry for screen printing,” ScreenPrinting, 79, 128, (Feb 1989).
219. Leech, C.S. Jr., “Surface tension and surface energy: Practical procedures for printing on problem plastics,” ScreenPrinting, 81, 52-62, (Jan 1991).
236. Maxham, D., “Pushing the limits: halftone screen printing on plastic containers,” ScreenPrinting, 83, 106-108, (Feb 1993).
257. Newberry, D., “Glass and ceramic surface dynamics,” ScreenPrinting, 85, 32-36, (Jul 1995).
285. Pennance, J.R., “The role of surface tension in printing on plastic films,” ScreenPrinting, 78, 64-69, (Jul 1988).
698. Nimmer, T.J., and R. Young, “An overview of surface treatment for three-dimensional objects,” ScreenPrinting, 93, 42-45, (Apr 2003).
1825. Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, eds., Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Scrivener, 2013.
2492. Dubreuil, M., E. Bongaers, and D. Vandgeneugden, “Adhesion improvement of polypropylene through aerosol assisted plasma deposition at atmospheric pressure,” in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, eds., 275-298, Scrivener, 2013.
2489. Inagaki, N., “Selective surface modification of polymeric materials by atmospheric-pressure plasmas: Selective substitution reactions on polymer surfaces by different plasmas,” in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, eds., 83-156, Scrivener, 2013.
2490. Moreno-Couranjou, M., N.D. Boscher, D. Duday, R. Maurau, E. Lecoq, and P. Choquet, “Atmospheric pressure plasma polymerization surface treatments by dielectric barrier discharge for enhanced polymer-polymer and metal-polymer adhesion,” in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, eds., 219-250, Scrivener, 2013.
2493. Rodriguez-Santiago, V., A.A. Bujanda, K.E. Strawhecker, and D.D. Pappas, “The effect of helium-air, helium-water vapor, helium-oxygen, and helium-nitrogen atmospheric pressure plasmas on the adhesion strength of polyethylene,” in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, eds., 299-314, Scrivener, 2013.
2488. Simor, M., and Y. Creyghton, “Treatment of polymer surfaces with surface dielectric barrier discharge plasmas,” in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, eds., 27-82, Scrivener, 2013.
2491. Thomas, M., M. Eichler, K. Lachmann, J. Borris, A. Hinze, and C.-P. Klages, “Adhesion improvement by nitrogen functionalization of polymers using DBD-based plasma,” in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, eds., 251-274, Scrivener, 2013.
2494. Tuominen, M., J. Lavonen, H. Teisala, M. Stepien, and J. Kuusipalo, “Atmospheric plasma treatment in extrusion coating, part 1: Surface wetting and LDPE adhesion to paper,” in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, eds., 329-354, Scrivener, 2003.
2495. Tuominen, M., J. Lavonen, J. Lahti, and J. Kuusipalo, “Atmospheric plasma treatment in extrusion coating, part 2: Surface modification of LDPE and PP coated papers,” in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, 355-382, Scrivener, 2013.
2487. Wolf, R.A., Atmospheric Pressure Plasma for Surface Modification, Scrivener, 2013.
912. Fogarty, W., “Wetting tension test kits,” Select Industrial Systems, 1991.
2186. Sparavigna, A.C., and R.A. Wolf, “Glow discharges for textiles: Atmospheric plasma technologies for textile industry,” Selezione Tessile, 40-44, (Sep 2005).
1346. Greig, S., “Web Treatment - Going Solventless,” Sherman Treaters Ltd., 2005.
605. Yializis, A., S.A. Pirzada, and W. Decker, “Atmospheric Plasma Treatment of Polymer Films,” Sigma Technologies, 2001.
2573. Mix, R., H. Yin, J.F. Friedrich, and A. Rau, “Polypropylene-aluminum adhesion by aerosol based DBD treatment of foils,” in Proceedings of the Third Asian Conference on Adhesion, 28-31, Society for Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009.
2789. De Rossi, U., O. Bolender, and B. Domanski, “Dynamic surface tension of UV-curable inkjet inks,” in NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference on Digital Printing Technologies, 788-792, Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Jan 2004.
28. Blitshteyn, M., “Overview of technologies for surface treatment of polymers for automotive applications,” in International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, Mar 1-5, 1993, Society of Automotive Engineers, Mar 1993.
81. DiGiacomo, J.D., and H.T. Lindland, “Flame treatment of polyolefin,” in Finishing '91, Society of Mechanical Engineers, Sep 1991.
199. Kolluri, O.S., S.L. Kaplan, and P.W. Rose, “Gas plasma and the treatment of advanced fibers,” in SPE Advanced Polymer Composites Conference Proceedings 1988, Society of Plastics Engineers, Nov 1988.
204. Kutsch, W.P., “Hot stamping applications and critical surface tension in the plastic industry,” in SPE Decorating Div. RETEC 1993, Society of Plastics Engineers, Oct 1993.
305. Rosenthal, L.A., “Corona discharge electrode concepts in film surface treatment,” in ANTEC 1980 Proceedings, 671-674, Society of Plastics Engineers, 1980.
418. Bataille, P., N. Belgacem, and S. Sapieha, “Properties of cellulose-polypropylene compounds subjected to corona treatment,” in ANTEC '93, 325-329, Society of Plastics Engineers, 1993.
420. Bergbreiter, D.E., et al, “New approaches in polymer surface modification,” in ANTEC 95, Society of Plastics Engineers, 1995.
424. Blitshteyn, M., “Surface treatment of polyolefin parts with electrical discharge,” in Decorating Div. ANTEC, Society of Plastics Engineers, 1995.
436. Chang, T.C., and B.Z. Jang, “Plasma treatments of carbon fibers in polymer composites,” in ANTEC 90, 1257-1260, Society of Plastics Engineers, 1990.
437. Chen, J., and H.L. Ren, “Research of instable interface mechanism in coextrusion,” in ANTEC 89, 206-211, Society of Plastics Engineers, 1989.
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->