Accudynetest logo

Products available online direct from the manufacturer

ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography

Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.

3022 results returned
showing result page 53 of 76, ordered by
 

1678. Della Volpe, C., and S. Siboni, “Calculations of acid-base surface tension components: SurfTen 4.3, a program for the calculation of acid-base solid surface free energy components,” http://devolmac.ing.unitn.it:8080/, Jul 2004.

2070. Hozumi, A., N. Shirahata, Y. Nakanishi, S. Asakura, and A. Fuwa, “Wettability control of a polymer surface through 126 nm vacuum ultraviolet light irradiation,” J. Vacuum Science and Technology, A22, 1309-1314, (Jul 2004).

The control of the surface wettability of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) substrates has been successfully demonstrated using an Ar2* excimer lamp radiating 126 nm vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) light. Each of the samples was exposed to 126 nm VUV light in air over the pressure range of 2×10−4-105 Pa. Although at the process pressures of 10, 103, and 105 Pa, the PMMA surfaces became relatively hydrophilic, the degree of hydrophilicity depended markedly on the pressure. The minimum water contact angles of the samples treated at 10, 103, and 105 Pa were about 50°, 33°, and 64°, respectively. These values were larger than those of PMMA substrates hydrophilized through 172 nm VUV irradiation conducted under the same conditions. On the other hand, after 126 nm VUV irradiation conducted under the high vacuum condition of 2×10−4 Pa, the PMMA substrate surface became carbon-rich, probably due to preferential cross-linking reactions, as evidenced by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. This surface was hydrophobic, showing a water contact angle of about 101°. Although the 126 nm VUV-irradiated surfaces appeared relatively smooth when observed by atomic force microscope, very small particles with diameters of 30-60 nm, which probably originated from the readhesion of photodecomposed products, existed on all of the sample surfaces.

2479. Tadmor R., “Line energy and the relation between advancing, receding, and Young contact angles,” Langmuir, 20, 7659-7664, (Jul 2004).

The line energy associated with the triple phase contact line is a function of local surface defects (chemical and topographical); however, it can still be calculated from the advancing and receding contact angles to which those defects give rise. In this study an expression for the line energy associated with the triple phase contact line is developed. The expression relates the line energy to the drop volume, the interfacial energies, and the actual contact angle (be it advancing, receding, or in between). From the expression we can back calculate the equilibrium Young contact angle, θ 0, as a function of the maximal advancing, θ A, and minimal receding, θ R, contact angles. To keep a certain maximal hysteresis between advancing and receding angles, different line energies are required depending on the three interfacial energies and the drop's volume V. We learn from the obtained expressions that the hysteresis is determined by some dimensionless parameter, script K sign, which is some normalized line energy. The value of script K sign required to keep a constant hysteresis (θ A - θ R) rises to infinity as we get closer to θ 0 = 90°.

1081. Park, Y.R., J.M. Song, J.S. Kim, and Y. Lee, “Effects of the number of acid groups on the hydrophilicity of the surface of PS-based ionomers,” in PMSE Preprints, American Chemical Society, Aug 2004.

1082. Rangwalla, H., A. Schwab, B. Yurdumakan, D. Yablon, M.S. Yeganeh, A. Dhinojwala, “Direct evidence of surface heterogeneity as a cause of contact-angle hysteresis,” in PMSE Preprints, American Chemical Society, Aug 2004.

1083. Morgan, W., “Why do I need corona treating & how does it work?,” Inside The FTA, (Aug 2004).

1258. Tavana, H., R. Gitiafroz, M. Hair, and A.W. Neumann, “Determination of solid surface tension from contact angles: The role of shape and size of liquid molecules,” J. Adhesion, 80, 705-725, (Aug 2004).

Accurate surface tension of Teflon® AF 1600 was determined using contact angles of liquids with bulky molecules. For one group of liquids, the contact angle data fall quite perfectly on a smooth curve corresponding to γsv = 13.61 mJ/m2, with a mean deviation of only ±0.24 degrees from this curve. Results suggest that these liquids do not interact with the solid in a specific fashion. However, contact angles of a second group of liquids with fairly bulky molecules containing oxygen atoms, nitrogen atoms, or both deviate somewhat from this curve, up to approximately 3 degrees. Specific interactions between solid and liquid molecules and reorientation of liquid molecules in the close vicinity of the solid surface are the most likely causes of the deviations. It is speculated that such processes induce a change in the solid–liquid interfacial tension, causing the contact angle deviations mentioned above. Criteria are established for determination of accurate solid surface tensions.

1355. Larner, M., and S.L. Kaplan, “The challenge of plasma processing - its diversity,” Presented at ASM Materials and Processes for Medical Devices Conference, Aug 2004.

2415. Strobel, M.A., C.S. Lyons, D.J. McClure, M.D. Nachbor, and J.R. Park, “Flame-treating process,” U.S. Patent 6780519, Aug 2004.

2554. Penache, C., C. Gessner, T. Betker, V. Bartels, A. Hollaender, and C.-P. Klages, “Plasma printing: Patterned surface functionalisation and coating at atmospheric pressure,” IEE Proceedings: Nanobiotechnology, 151, 139-144, (Aug 2004).

A new plasma-based micropatterning technique, here referred to as plasma printing, combines the well known advantages given by the nonequilibrium character of a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) and its operation inside small gas volumes with dimension between tens and hundreds of micrometres. The discharge is run at atmospheric pressure and can be easily implemented for patterned surface treatment with applications in biotechnology and microtechnology. In this work the local modification of dielectric substrates, e.g. polymeric films, is addressed with respect to coating and chemical functionalisation, immobilisation of biomolecules and area-selective electroless plating.

1089. Qiu, Y., X. Shao, C. Jensen, Y.J. Hwang, C. Zhang, and M.G. McCord, “The effects of atmospheric pressure plasma treatments on adhesion and mechanical properties of high-performance fibers for composites,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 3-24, VSP, Sep 2004.

1090. Tanaka, T., M. Yoshida, M. Shinohara, S. Watanabe, and T. Takagi, “Surface modification of PET films by plasma source ion implantation,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 69-82, VSP, Sep 2004.

1091. Gotoh, K., “Wettability and surface free energies of polymeric materials exposed to excimer ultraviolet light and particle deposition onto their surfaces in water,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 125-138, VSP, Sep 2004.

1092. Desai, H., L. Xiaolu, A. Entenberg, B. Kahn, F.D. Egitto, L.J. Matienzo, et al, “Adhesion of copper to poly(tetrafluoroethylene) surfaces modified with vacuum UV radiation downstream from He and Ar microwave plasmas,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 139-158, VSP, Sep 2004.

1093. Zeng, J., and A.N. Netravali, “KrF excimer laser surface modification of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene fibers for improved adhesion to epoxy resins,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 159-182, VSP, Sep 2004.

1094. Sancaktar, E., and N. Sunthonpagasit, “Surface modification of polypropylene for improved adhesion,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 285-324, VSP, Sep 2004.

1100. McLaughlin, J.B., S.S. Suppiah, N. Moumen, and R.S. Subramanian, “Modeling of drop motion on solid surfaces with wettability gradients,” Presented at 12th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Sep 2004.

1101. Blake, T.D., R.A. Dobson, and K.J. Ruschak, “Wetting at high capillary numbers,” Presented at 12th International Coating Science and Technology Symposium, Sep 2004.

1103. Eckert, W., “Corona- and flame treatment of polymer film, foil and paperboard,” in 2004 PLACE Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, Sep 2004.

1104. Markgraf, D.A., “Analysis of new flame treatment technology for surface modification and adhesion promotion,” in 2004 PLACE Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, Sep 2004.

1105. Schubert, G., and O. Plassmann, “Shedding a new light on corona-treated alu-foil,” in 2004 PLACE Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, Sep 2004.

1224. Kovalchuk, V.I., E.K. Zholkovskiy, M.P. Bondarenko, and D. Vollhardt, “Ion redistribution near the polar groups in the Langmuir wetting process,” J. Adhesion, 80, 851-870, (Sep 2004).

The theoretical analysis of electrostatic interactions and ion redistribution in the close vicinity of the three-phase contact line shows their important role in the Langmuir wetting process. To provide a sufficient rate for the ion transfer, which is intended to neutralize the interfacial charge, the concentration and potential distributions deviate from the equilibrium. As a consequence, during the deposition process the adhesion work, and hence the contact angle, are defined by the local ionic concentrations near the three-phase contact line. The concentration profiles and the electro-diffusion ion fluxes induced during the Langmuir wetting process are strongly dependent on the subphase composition and on the monolayer properties. The results of the analysis are in a good agreement with the experiments.

2068. Guruvenket, S., G. Mohan Rao, M. Komath, and A.M. Raichur, “Plasma surface modification of polystyrene and polyethylene,” Applied Surface Science, 236, 278-284, (Sep 2004).

Polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE) samples were treated with argon and oxygen plasmas. Microwave electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) was used to generate the argon and oxygen plasmas and these plasmas were used to modify the surface of the polymers. The samples were processed at different microwave powers and treatment time and the surface modification of the polymer was evaluated by measuring the water contact angle of the samples before and after the modification. Decrease in the contact angle was observed with the increase in the microwave power for both polystyrene and polyethylene. Plasma parameters were assessed using Langmuir probe measurements. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed the evidence for the induction of oxygen-based functional groups in both polyethylene and polystyrene when treated with the oxygen plasma. Argon treatment of the polymers showed improvement in the wettability which is attributed to the process called as CASING, on the other hand the oxygen plasma treatment of the polymers showed surface functionalization. Correlation between the plasma parameters and the surface modification of the polymer is also discussed.

2460. Sutton, S.P., “Capillary devices for determination of surface characteristics can contact angles and methods for using same,” U.S. Patent Application 20040187565, Sep 2004.

2529. Truica-Marasescu, F., P. Jedrzejowski, and M.R. Wertheimer, “Hydrophobic recovery of vacuum ultraviolet irradiated polyolefin surfaces,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, 1, 153-163, (Sep 2004).

Film samples of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and biaxially oriented poly(propylene) (BOPP) were surface modified by vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) irradiation using a Kr resonant lamp at λ = 123.6 nm in low-pressure ammonia gas, and were then stored in air. The time-dependence of the surface properties was monitored using several complementary surface-sensitive techniques such as contact angle goniometry (CAG), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy (ToF-SIMS), which allows one to determine the surface energy, and chemical composition at different depths. The relative importance of four possible mechanisms involved in surface hydrophobic recovery is discussed, and we show that in our particular case the main mechanism is rotational and/or translational motion of polymer chains and chain segments. This restructuring determines the observed “loss” of functional groups, which occurs within the first few monolayers of the surface (∼1 nm), as shown by the ToF-SIMS results, and which leads to the observed decrease in the surface energy. In the deeper surface regions (∼10 nm) long-lived radicals react with oxygen and water vapor upon exposure to the atmosphere, leading to an increase in the concentration of bound oxygen, as observed by XPS. Finally, CAG measurements show that the hydrophobic recovery is reversible and can be significantly reduced by cross-linking near the surface, as illustrated by depth sensing nano-indentation measurements on BOPP surfaces.

1107. Markgraf, D.A., “The treatment of thinner substrates,” Presented at 2004 AIMCAL Fall Technical Conference, Oct 2004.

1108. Mount, E.M. III, “Review of metallized film adhesion testing: Test methods and interpretation of results,” Presented at 2004 AIMCAL Fall Technical Conference, Oct 2004.

1116. Schoff, C.K., “Coatings clinic: Wetting and wettability,” JCT CoatingsTech, 1, 108, (Oct 2004).

2071. Hozumi, A., H. Inagaki, and T. Kameyama, “The hydrophilization of polystyrene substrates by 172-nm vacuum ultraviolet light,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 278, 383-392, (Oct 2004).

This paper describes the photochemical surface modification of polystyrene (PS) substrates using vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) light 172 nm in wavelength. We have particularly focused on the effects of atmospheric pressure during VUV irradiation on the obtained surface's wettability and the stability of the wettability, in addition to its chemical structure, morphology, and photooxidation rate. Samples were photoirradiated with VUV light under pressures of 10, 10(3), or 10(5) Pa. Although, in each case, the originally hydrophobic PS surface became highly hydrophilic, the final water-contact angle and photooxidation rate depended on the atmospheric pressure. The samples treated at 10 Pa were less wettable than those prepared at 10(3) and 10(5) Pa due to the shortage of oxygen molecules in the atmosphere. The minimum water-contact angles of the samples treated at 10, 10(3), and 10(5) Pa were about 8 degrees, 0 degrees, and 0 degrees, respectively. With the samples prepared at 10 and 10(3) Pa, photooxidation reactions proceeded in the topmost region closest to the surface, while at 10(5) Pa photooxidation was found to be greatly enhanced in the deeper regions, as evidenced by angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Photoetching rates were determined through atomic force microscope observation of microstructured PS samples prepared by a simple mesh-contact method. As estimated from AFM images of the latticed microstructures obtained, the rates of samples prepared at 10(3) and 10(5) Pa were about 1.5 and 1.3 nm/min, respectively. However, no photoetched features were observable on the sample surface prepared at 10 Pa. Hydrophilic stability also varied greatly depending on atmospheric pressure. The hydrophilicity of samples treated at 10 and 10(3) Pa gradually decreased as they were exposed to air. On the other hand, the sample surface prepared at 10(5) Pa showed excellent hydrophilicity even after being left in air for 30 days.

2516. Inagaki, N., K. Narushima, N. Tuchida, and K. Miyazaki, “Surface characterization of plasma-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) film surfaces,” J. Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 42, 3727-3740, (Oct 2004).

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) film surfaces were modified by argon (Ar), oxygen (O2), hydrogen (H2), nitrogen (N2), and ammonia (NH3) plasmas, and the plasma-modified PET surfaces were investigated with scanning probe microscopy, contact-angle measurements, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to characterize the surfaces. The exposure of the PET film surfaces to the plasmas led to the etching process on the surfaces and to changes in the topography of the surfaces. The etching rate and surface roughness were closely related to what kind of plasma was used and how high the radio frequency (RF) power was that was input into the plasmas. The etching rate was in the order of O2 plasma > H2 plasma > N2 plasma > Ar plasma > NH3 plasma, and the surface roughness was in the order of NH3 plasma > N2 plasma > H2 plasma > Ar plasma > O2 plasma. Heavy etching reactions did not always lead to large increases in the surface roughness. The plasmas also led to changes in the surface properties of the PET surfaces from hydrophobic to hydrophilic; and the contact angle of water on the surfaces decreased. Modification reactions occurring on the PET surfaces depended on what plasma had been used for the modification. The O2, Ar, H2, and N2 plasmas modified mainly CH2 or phenyl rings rather than ester groups in the PET polymer chains to form CSingle BondO groups. On the other hand, the NH3 plasma modified ester groups to form CSingle BondO groups. Aging effects of the plasma-modified PET film surfaces continued as long as 15 days after the modification was finished. The aging effects were related to the movement of CDouble BondO groups in ester residues toward the topmost layer and to the movement of CSingle BondO groups away from the topmost layer. Such movement of the CDouble BondO groups could occur within at least 3 nm from the surface. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 3727–3740, 2004
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/polb.20234

1269. Guimond, S., and M.R. Wertheimer, “Surface degradation and hydrophobic recovery of polyolefins treated by air corona and nitrogen atmospheric pressure glow discharge,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 94, 1291-1303, (Nov 2004).

The surface degradation and production of low molecular weight oxidized materials (LMWOM) on biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) films was investigated and compared for two different dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) treatment types, namely air corona and nitrogen atmospheric pressure glow discharge (N2 APGD). Contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) analyses were performed in conjunction with rinsing the treated films in water. It is shown that N2 APGD treatments of both polyolefins result in much less surface degradation, therefore, allowing for a significantly higher degree of functionalization and better wettability. Hydrophobic recovery of the treated films has also been studied by monitoring their surface energy (γs) over a period of time extending up to several months after treatment. Following both surface modification techniques, the treated polyolefin films were both found to undergo hydrophobic recovery; however, for N2 APGD modified surfaces, γs ceases to decrease after a few days and attains a higher stable value than in the case of air corona treated films. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 1291–1303, 2004
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/app.21134

1468. Lahti, J. A. Savolainen, J.P. Rasanen, T. Suominen, and H. Huhtinen, “The role of surface modification in digital printing on polymer-coated packaging board,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 44, 2052-2060, (Nov 2004).

Digital printing is increasingly being used for package printing. One of the major techniques of digital printing is dry-toner electrophotography. This paper evaluates the printability of three different extrusion coatings used for packaging boards: low-density polyethylene (PE-LD), ethylene methyl acrylate (E/MA) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Extrusion coatings in general have an impervious, chemically inert, nonporous surface with low surface energies that cause them to be non-receptive to bonding with toners. The most common methods used in improving the adhesion properties of polymer coatings are different surface treatments. These increase the surface energy and also provide the polar molecular groups necessary for good bonds between the toner and polymer molecules. The polymer coatings have been modified with electrical corona discharge treatment. The effects of corona on polymer surfaces and the correlation between surface modification and print quality have been evaluated. Results show that sufficiently high surface energy and surface-charge uniformity are necessary for even print quality and toner adhesion. E/MA and PET have the required surface-energy level without the corona treatment, but PE-LD needs surface modification in order to succeed in the electrophotographic process. E/MA also has exceptional surface-charge properties compared with PET and PE-LD. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:2052–2060, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.

1536. Becker, K.H., U. Kogelschatz, K.H. Schoenbach, and R.J. Barker, eds., Non-Equilibrium Air Plasmas at Atmospheric Pressure, Institute of Physics, Nov 2004.

1537. Kogelschatz, U., Y.S. Akishev, and A.P. Napartovich, “History of non-equilibrium air discharges,” in Non-Equilibrium Air Plasmas at Atmospheric Pressure, Becker, K.H., U. Kogelschatz, K.H. Schoenbach, and R.J. Barker, eds., 17-75, Institute of Physics, Nov 2004.

1538. Becker, K.H., M. Schmidt, A.A. Viggiano, R. Dressler, and S. Williams, “Air plasma chemistry,” in Non-Equilibrium Air Plasmas at Atmospheric Pressure, Becker, K.H., U. Kogelschatz, K.H. Schoenbach, and R.J. Barker, eds., 124-182, Institute of Physics, Nov 2004.

1539. Kogelschatz, U., Y.S. Akishev, K.H. Becker, E.E. Kunhart, M. Kogoma, et al, “DC and low frequency air plasma sources,” in Non-Equilibrium Air Plasmas at Atmospheric Pressure, Becker, K.H., U. Kogelschatz, K.H. Schoenbach, and R.J. Barker, eds., 276-361, Institute of Physics, Nov 2004.

1540. Laroussi, M., K.H. Schoenbach, U. Kogelschatz, R.J. Vidmar, S. Kuo, et al, “Current applications of atmospheric pressure air plasmas,” in Non-Equilibrium Air Plasmas at Atmospheric Pressure, Becker, K.H., U. Kogelschatz, K.H. Schoenbach, and R.J. Barker, eds., 537-678, Institute of Physics, Nov 2004.

1529. Zhi, F., Q. Yuchang, and W. Hui, “Surface treatment of polyethylene terephthalate film using atmospheric pressure glow discharge in air,” Plasma Science and Technology, 6, 2576-2580, (Dec 2004).

Non-thermal plasmas under atmospheric pressure are of great interest in polymer surface processing because of their convenience, effectiveness and low cost. In this paper, the treatment of Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film surface for improving hydrophilicity using the non-thermal plasma generated by atmospheric pressure glow discharge (APGD) in air is conducted. The discharge characteristics of APGD are shown by measurement of their electrical discharge parameters and observation of light-emission phenomena, and the surface properties of PET before and after the APGD treatment are studied using contact angle measurement, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEh4). It is found that the APGD is homogeneous and stable in the whole gas gap, which differs from the commonly filamentary dielectric barrier discharge (DBD). -4 short time (several seconds) APGD treatment can modify the surface characteristics of PET film markedly and uniformly. After 10 s APGD treatment, the surface oxygen content of PET surface increases to 39%, and the water contact angle decreases to 19°, respectively.

902. Rentzhog, M., and A. Fogden, “Rheology and surface tension of water-based flexographic inks and implications for wetting of PE-coated board,” Nordic Pulp & Paper Research J., 20, 399-409, (2005).

This study systematically characterises a matrix of water-based flexographic inks with respect to their rheology, surface tension and wetting of liquid packaging board, to provide a basis for interpretation and prediction of their printing performance. For all pigment and acrylate polymer vehicles and mixing proportions the inks were shown to be shear thinning and thixotropic, with plastic viscosity, yield stress and storage and loss moduli increasing strongly with content of solution polymer (at comparable solids contents). The solution polymer decreases the static surface tension of the inks, but generally leads to an increase in their equilibrium drop contact angle on the polyethylene- (PE-) coated board due to increase in the ink-board interfacial energy. The solution polymer also decreases the drop spreading rate, and a simple model is tested to express the spreading dynamics in terms of equilibrium contact angle and a rate parameter given by the effective ratio of surface tension to viscosity.

1106. Yasuda, H., Luminous Chemical Vapor Deposition and Interface, Marcel Dekker, 2005.

 

<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->

 Build ID built-Jan 3 2011-13:54:18
 Page ID 4138927331
 MGI Version 3.2.3
 MGI Region Path /
 Virtual Host Name dev.accudynetest.com
 Parameter Count 0
 Parameter List 
 Tag Body 
 Page Variable Count 21
 Page Variable List mgiSBShippingTotal="0.00"
 bibVar_Page="53"
 tIndex="8"
 bibVar_ResultCount="3022"
 prevURL="bibliography2.html?pageID=52&bibsort=dateasc"
 nextURL="bibliography2.html?pageID=54&bibsort=dateasc"
 bibsort="dateasc"
 bibVar_LastPage="76"
 token=""
 mgiSBSubtotal="0.00"
 bibVar_FirstIndex="2081"
 bibVar_PrevPage="52"
 textURL="bibliography2.html?pageID=76&bibsort=dateasc"
 bibVar_NextPage="54"
 searchstring="NOT auth='' ORDER BY publyymm"
 mgiSBTotal="0.00"
 numberURL="| <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=1&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">1</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=2&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">2</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=3&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">3</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=4&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">4</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=5&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">5</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=6&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">6</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=7&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">7</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=8&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">8</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=9&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">9</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=10&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">10</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=11&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">11</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=12&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">12</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=13&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">13</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=14&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">14</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=15&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">15</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=16&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">16</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=17&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">17</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=18&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">18</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=19&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">19</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=20&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">20</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=21&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">21</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=22&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">22</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=23&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">23</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=24&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">24</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=25&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">25</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=26&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">26</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=27&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">27</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=28&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">28</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=29&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">29</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=30&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">30</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=31&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">31</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=32&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">32</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=33&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">33</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=34&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">34</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=35&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">35</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=36&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">36</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=37&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">37</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=38&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">38</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=39&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">39</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=40&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">40</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=41&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">41</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=42&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">42</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=43&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">43</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=44&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">44</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=45&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">45</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=46&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">46</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=47&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">47</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=48&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">48</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=49&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">49</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=50&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">50</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=51&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">51</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=52&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">52</a> | 53 | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=54&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">54</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=55&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">55</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=56&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">56</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=57&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">57</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=58&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">58</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=59&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">59</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=60&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">60</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=61&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">61</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=62&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">62</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=63&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">63</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=64&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">64</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=65&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">65</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=66&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">66</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=67&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">67</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=68&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">68</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=69&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">69</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=70&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">70</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=71&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">71</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=72&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">72</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=73&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">73</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=74&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">74</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=75&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">75</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=76&bibsort=dateasc" class="numURL">76</a>"
 page="53"
 iatatest=""
 bibVar_LastIndex="2120"
 searchString1="token = ''"
 HTML POST Argument Count 0
 HTML POST Argument List 
 URL Path Argument Count 2
 URL Path Argument List bibsort="dateasc"
 pageID="53"
 CGI AUTH_TYPE 
 CGI CONTENT_LENGTH 
 CGI CONTENT_TYPE 
 CGI GATEWAY_INTERFACE CGI/1.1
 CGI HTTP_ACCEPT */*
 CGI HTTP_REFERER 
 CGI HTTP_USER_AGENT Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
 CGI PATH_INFO 
 CGI QUERY_STRING bibsort=dateasc&pageID=53
 CGI REMOTE_ADDR 3.145.167.64
 CGI REMOTE_HOST 
 CGI REMOTE_IDENT 
 CGI REMOTE_USER 
 CGI REQUEST_METHOD GET
 CGI SCRIPT_NAME /bibliography2.html
 CGI SERVER_PORT 80
 CGI SERVER_PROTOCOL 
 CGI SERVER_NAME dev.accudynetest.com
 CGI SERVER_SOFTWARE MGI Apache