ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 7 of 76, ordered by
813. Borcia, G., C.A. Anderson, and N.M.D. Brown, “The surface oxidation of selected polymers using an atmospheric pressure air dielectric barrier discharge: Part II,” Applied Surface Science, 225, 186-197, (Mar 2004).
In this paper, we report and discuss the results of the surface treatment, using an atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), of selected polymer films which have no bonded oxygen in their intrinsic structures. Contact angle, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) data are presented with respect to post-treatment characterisation and the dependence of these outcomes on the salient processing variables: energy dissipated, exposure duration and inter-electrode gap. Under the treatment conditions used, remarkably uniform treatment and markedly stable modified surface properties result from the test surfaces exposed to the discharge, even at transit speeds simulating those associated with continuous on-line processing. The DBD system thus described, provides chemically mild and mechanically non-destructive means of altering surface properties, targeting improved surface characteristics and potentially better application performance.
1362. Borcia, G., C.A. Anderson, and N.M.D. Brown, “Dielectric barrier discharge for surface treatment: Application to selected polymers in film and fibre form,” Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 12, 335-344, (2003).
1363. Borcia, G., C.A. Anderson, and N.M.D. Brown, “The surface oxidation of selected polymers using an atmospheric pressure air dielectric barrier discharge. Part I,” Applied Surface Science, 221, 203-214, (Jan 2004).
In this paper, we report and discuss the results of the surface treatment, using an atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), of selected polymer films which have no bonded oxygen in their intrinsic structures. Contact angle, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) data are presented with respect to post-treatment characterisation and the dependence of these outcomes on the salient processing variables: energy dissipated, exposure duration and inter-electrode gap. Under the treatment conditions used, remarkably uniform treatment and markedly stable modified surface properties result from the test surfaces exposed to the discharge, even at transit speeds simulating those associated with continuous on-line processing. The DBD system thus described, provides chemically mild and mechanically non-destructive means of altering surface properties, targeting improved surface characteristics and potentially better application performance.
2504. Borcia, G., C.A. Anderson, and N.M.D. Brown, “Using a nitrogen dielectric barrier discharge for surface treatment,” Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 14, 259-267, (May 2005).
In this paper, continuing previous work, we report on the installation and the testing of an experimental dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor run in a controlled atmospheric pressure gaseous environment other than air. Here, the effects of a N2-DBD treatment on the surface of a test polymer material (UHMW polyethylene) are examined, reported, discussed and compared to results obtained previously following air-DBD treatment. Surface analysis and characterization were performed using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, contact angle measurement and scanning electron microscopy before and following the DBD processing described. The discharge parameters used were correlated with the changes in the surface characteristics found following DBD treatments of various durations in a nitrogen atmosphere. The work focuses on the control of the gaseous environment supporting the discharge and on the possibility of overcoming the potentially dominant effect of reactive oxygen-related species, derived from any residual air present. The results obtained underline the very high reactivity of such species in the discharge, but are encouraging in respect of the possibility of the implantation or generation of functional groups other than oxygen-related ones at the surface of interest. The processing conditions concerned simulate 'real' continuous high speed processing, allowing the planning of further experiments, where various gaseous mixtures of the type X + N2 will be used for controlled surface functionalization.
830. Borges, J.N., T. Belmonte, J. Guillot, D. Duday, M. Moreno-Couranjou, P. Choquet, and H.-N. Migeon, “Functionalization of copper surfaces by plasma treatments to improve adhesion of epoxy resins,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, 6, S490-S495, (Jun 2009).
Adhesion of epoxy resins on copper foils for printed circuit board (PCB) applications is improved by nearly a factor of 5, using surface cleaning and deposition of a 15-nm-thick film in a low-pressure remote plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition process. The cleaning pretreatment, using an N2–O2 oxidizing gas mixture with moderate heating (343 K), gives the best results. This pretreatment removes the carbonaceous contaminants present on the topmost surface of the sample and slightly oxidizes the copper into CuO. This oxide is then reduced during the deposition treatment, presumably by reaction with the aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) precursor. The surface roughness is unchanged after treatment, thereby showing that the improvement of the copper/epoxy adhesion is only due to the chemistry of the plasma coating. Applying these results to dielectric barrier discharges allows us to achieve the same level of adhesion, which, therefore, does not depend on the process.
1646. Borris, J., A. Dohse, A. Hinze, M. Thomas, C.-P. Klages, A. Mobius, D. Elbick, and E.-R. Weidlich, “Improvement of the adhesion of a galvanic metallization of polymers by surface functionalization using dielectric barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, 6, S297-S301, (Jun 2009).
An environmentally friendly plasma amination process for the activation of polymers prior to electroless metallization using dielectric barrier discharges (DBD) at atmospheric pressure was investigated. One focus of the work was on the correlation between plasma parameters and palladium coverage on the polymer on the one hand and the palladium coverage and adhesion of a galvanic copper metallization on the other hand. Using XPS spectroscopy it was found that a DBD treatment of polyimide (PI) films with mixtures of N2 and H2 leads to considerably higher Pd surface concentrations than on untreated reference samples or foils treated in air-DBD. The Pd coverages achieved result in peel strengths of a copper metallization of up to 1.4 N · mm−1.
35. Bose, A., “Wetting by solutions,” in Wettability, Berg, J.C., ed., 149-182, Marcel Dekker, Apr 1993.
2110. Bottin, M.F., H.P. Schreiber, J. Klemberg-Sapieha, and M.R. Wertheimer, “Modification of paper surface properties by microwave plasmas,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 38, 193-200, (1984).
1451. Botwell, M., “Meeting focuses on adhesion and surface analysis,” Adhesives Age, 35, 51-52, (Jul 1992).
1923. Bousquet, A., G. Pannier, E. Ibarboure, E. Papon, and J. Rodriguez-Hernandez, “Control of the surface properties of polymer blends,” J. Adhesion, 83, 335-349, (Apr 2007).
We report on the preparation of amphiphilic diblock copolymers containing a hydrophilic segment, poly(acrylic acid)(PAA), and a polystyrene hydrophobic part. We analysed, by means of contact-angle measurements, how the hydrophilic segments usually bury themselves under the hydrophobic when exposed to air to reduce the surface free energy of the system. In contrast, in contact with water, the hydrophilic blocks have a tendency to segregate to the interface. We first describe the parameters that control the surface reconstruction when the environmental conditions are inversed from dry air to water vapour. Then, annealing time, temperature, composition and size of the diblock copolymers, and size of the matrix that influenced the surface migration process are the main parameters also considered. Finally, the density of the carboxylic functions placed at the surface was determined using the methylene blue method.
1034. Boyd, R.D., A.M. Kenwright, J.P.S. Badyal, and D. Briggs, “Atmospheric non-equilibrium plasma treatment of biaxially oriented polypropylene,” Macromolecules, 30, 5429-5436, (Sep 1997).
36. Boyle, E., “Taking the measure of surface treatment is a learning process,” Paper Film & Foil Converter, 70, 52-54, (Oct 1996).
2198. Boyle, E., “Treat 'em right,” Paper Film & Foil Converter, 81, 0, (Jul 2007).
932. Bradley, A., and J.D. Fales, “Prospects for industrial applications of electrical discharge,” Chemical Technology, 1, 232-237, (Apr 1971).
1731. Bradley, J.M., “Determining the dispersive and polar contributions to the surface tension of water-based printing ink as a function of surfactant surface excess,” J. Physics D: Applied Physics, 38, 2045-2050, (2005).
The surface tension of a model, water-based, flexographic printing ink was measured at a range of surfactant concentrations along with the equilibrium contact angle formed with polymer substrates. The surface excess of surfactant at each concentration was calculated using the Gibbs adsorption isotherm and assumed equal to the concentration of surfactant at the interface. The change in the surface tension of the ink formulation was assumed to be determined entirely by the surface concentration of surfactant. This allowed the estimation of the surface tension at the solid–liquid and solid–vapour boundaries when in contact with substrate based on the values obtained for pendant drops. The associated polar and dispersive contributions to the surface tension were then calculated using the Young–Dupré equation. The values of the polar and dispersive surface tension components extracted in this manner were compared with those calculated using the approach of van Oss, Chaudhury and Good. The use of surface excess in estimating the contributions to surface tension was found to give far better agreement with experimental data than the van Oss approach which is intended for use with pure liquids.
1570. Bradley, J.W., and P.M. Bryant, “The diagnosis of plasmas used in the processing of textiles and other materials,” in Plasma Technologies for Textiles, Shishoo, R., ed., 25-63, Woodhead Publishing, Mar 2007.
2316. Brandt, R., and C.H. Hartford, “Corona treating of shaped articles,” U.S. Patent 3183352, May 1965.
2831. Brehmer, F., “Gentle plasma - surface treatment for sensitive materials,” https://3dtllc.com/gentle-plasma-surface-treatment-sensitive-materials/, Dec 2016.
37. Brennan, W.J., W.J. Feast, H.S. Munro, and S.A. Walker, “Investigation of the ageing of plasma oxidized PEEK,” Polymer, 32, 1527-1530, (1991).
714. Breuer, J., H. Schafer, V. Schlett, S. Metev, G. Sepold, and O.-D. Hennemann, “Adherence enhancement of polymers with low surface energy by excimer laser radiation,” Presented at First International Congress on Adhesion Science and Technology, Oct 1995.
38. Breuer, J., S. Metev, G. Sepold, et al, “Laser-induced photochemical adherence enhancement,” Applied Surface Science, 46, 336-341, (1990).
1146. Brewis, D.M., “Pre-treatment of polymers,” in Handbook of Adhesion, 2nd Ed., Packham, D.E., ed., 381-383, John Wiley & Sons, Jul 2005.
1147. Brewis, D.M., “Pre-treatments of polyolefins,” in Handbook of Adhesion, 2nd Ed., Packham, D.E., ed., 383-385, John Wiley & Sons, Jul 2005.
1344. Brewis, D.M., “Surface modification of fluoropolymers for adhesion,” Presented at Fluoropolymers Conference, 1992.
1462. Brewis, D.M., “Adhesion problems at polymer surfaces,” Progress in Rubber and Plastics Technology, 1, 1-21, (Oct 1985).
1955. Brewis, D.M., “Pretreatments of hydrocarbon and fluorocarbon polymers,” J. Adhesion, 37, 97-107, (Feb 1992).
1448. Brewis, D.M., I. Mathieson, I. Sutherland, and R.A. Cayless, “Adhesion studies of fluoropolymers,” J. Adhesion, 41, 113-128, (1993).
1076. Brewis, D.M., I. Mathieson, and M. Wolfensburger, “Treatment of low energy surfaces for adhesive bonding,” Intl. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 15, 87-90, (1995).
1196. Brewis, D.M., and D. Briggs, “Adhesion to polyethylene and polypropylene,” Polymer, 22, 7-16, (1981).
1945. Brewis, D.M., and G.W. Critchlow, “Adhesion and surface analysis,” J. Adhesion, 54, 175-199, (Dec 1995).
666. Brewis, D.M., and I. Mathieson, “Pretreatments of fluoropolymers. A review of studies between 1990 and 1995,” in First International Congress on Adhesion Science and Technology: Festschrift in Honor of Dr. K.L. Mittal on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday, van Ooij, W.J., and H.R. Anderson, Jr., eds., 267-283, VSP, 1998.
736. Brewis, D.M., and I. Mathieson, “Flame treatment of polymers to improve adhesion,” in Adhesion Promotion Techniques: Technological Applications, Mittal, K.L., and A. Pizzi, eds., 175-190, Marcel Dekker, Feb 1999.
886. Brewis, D.M., and I. Mathieson, Adhesion and Bonding to Polyolefins (Rapra Review Report 143), Rapra, Jun 2002.
1436. Brewis, D.M., and R.H. Dahm, Adhesion to Fluoropolymers (Rapra Review Report 183), Rapra Technology, Jul 2006.
1476. Brewis, D.M., ed., Surface Analysis and Pretreatment of Plastics and Metals, Applied Science, Feb 1982.
42. Briggs, D., “New developments in polymer surface analysis,” Polymer, 25, 1379-1391, (1984).
43. Briggs, D., “Analysis and chemical imaging of polymer surfaces by SIMS,” in Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces, Feast, W.J., and H.S. Munro, eds., 33-53, John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
428. Briggs, D., “XPS studies of polymer surface modifications and adhesion mechanisms,” J. Adhesion, 13, 287, (1982).
850. Briggs, D., Surface Analysis of Polymers by XPS and Static SIMS, Cambridge University Press, Apr 1998.
854. Briggs, D., “Applications of XPS in polymer technology,” in Practical Surface Analysis, 2nd Ed., Vol. 1: Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Briggs, D., and M.P. Seah, eds., 437-484, John Wiley & Sons, 1990.
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->