ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 57 of 76, ordered by
566. Seffins, W., “A model treatment of solid/liquid interfacial energies for non-zero contact angle systems (MS thesis),” Univ. of Texas, El Paso, 1981.
1674. Seidel, C., C. Damm, and H. Muenstedt, “Surface modification of films of various high temperature resistant thermoplastics,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 21, 423-439, (2007).
The influence of different surface treatments on the physical and chemical surface properties of poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK), poly(phenylenesulfide) (PPS) and a liquid crystal polymer (LCP) was studied. For all the three polymers, the adhesion strength of an adhesively-bonded copper foil could be increased significantly by a chemical etching process using chromic sulphuric acid or a low pressure air-plasma treatment. However, for LCP the enhancement of adhesion by the surface treatments was lower than for the other polymers. Peel tests were employed for determining the adhesion strength of the copper foil. The physical surface properties were investigated by laser scanning microscopy (LSM). Contact-angle measurements and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) provided detailed information on the chemical surface properties. The detailed XPS analyses revealed different chemical mechanisms of the surface treatments depending on the polymer investigated. In all cases an incorporation of oxygen containing groups by the surface treatments was found to be responsible for a better adhesion of the copper foil on the treated polymer films compared to the untreated.
1734. Seidel, C., H. Kopf, B. Gotsmann, T. Vieth, H. Fuchs, and K. Reihs, “Ar plasma treated and Al metallised polycarbonate: an XPS, mass spectroscopy and SFM study,” Applied Surface Science, 150, 19-33, (1999).
764. Seifert, A.M., “The spinning drop tensiometry,” in Drops and Bubbles in Interfacial Research, Mobius, D., and R. Miller, eds, 187-238, Elsevier, Jun 1998.
2834. Seitz, V., K. Azrt, S. Mahnel, C. Rapp, S. Schwaminger, M. Hoffstetter, E. Wintermantel, “Improvement of adhesion strength of self-adhesive silicone rubber on thermoplastic substrates - Comparison of atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) and a Pyrosil flame,” Intl. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 66, 65-72, (Apr 2016).
Polymeric hard/soft combinations consisting of a rigid, thermoplastic substrate and an elastomeric component offer many advantages for plastic parts in industry. Manufactured in one step by multi-component injection moulding, the strength of the thermoplastics can be combined with sealing, damping or haptic properties of an elastomer. Bonds of self-adhesive liquid silicone rubber (LSR) on high performance thermoplastics such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or polyphenylene sulphide (PPS) are especially interesting e.g. for medical applications due to their outstanding resistance properties. To ensure good adhesion between the two components, surface treatments from an atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) and a Pyrosil® flame are applied. Chemical changes on the thermoplastic surfaces are verified by water contact angle measurement (CA) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Plasma treatment causes a decline in water contact angle, indicating the formation of functional groups, especially –OH, on the surface. XPS measurements confirm the increase of oxygen on the surface. Thus, the number of functional groups on the thermoplastic surface is enlarged by plasma treatment, leading to stronger bonding to the organofunctional silanes of the self-adhesive silicone rubber. A thin layer of silanol groups is created by the Pyrosil® flame on the thermoplastic substrates, which could be verified by XPS. A hydrophilic behaviour of the coated surface is noticed. Both surface modification methods lead to enhanced adhesion properties of self-adhesive LSR on thermoplastic surfaces. This is confirmed by 90°- peel tests of the injection-moulded composites leading to an increase in peel force by the applied surface modification techniques.
1332. Sell, P.J., and A.W. Neumann, “Estimation of surface and interfacial tensions of solids,” Z. Physik. Chem. Neue Folge, 41, 191-196, (1964).
2408. Selwyn, G., I. Henins, S.E. Babayan, and R.F. Hicks, “Large area atmospheric-pressure plasma jet,” U.S. Patent 6262523, Jul 2001.
1489. Semal, S., T.D. Blake, V. Geskin, M.J. de Ruijter, G. Castelein, J. de Coninck, “Influence of surface roughness on wetting dynamics,” Langmuir, 15, 8765-8770, (1999).
2874. Sengupta, A., and H.P. Schreiber, “Surface characteristics of polyurethane adhesive formulations,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 5, 947-957, (1991).
567. Sengupta, K.S., and H.K. Birnbaum, “Structural and chemical effects of low-energy ion bombardment of PMMA-ODA surfaces,” J. Vacuum Science and Technology, A9, 2928-2935, (1991).
1038. Seok-Keun, K., P. Sung-Chul, K. Sung-Ryong, et al, “Surface modification of polytetrafluoroethylene by Ar+ irradiation for improved adhesion to other materials,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 64, 1913-1921, (Jun 1997).
2785. Seppanen, R., M. Sundin, A. Swerin, and B. Brandner, “Relation between surface energy, topography, wettability and detailed surface chemistry by spectroscopy for coated printing papers,” in 2008 Advanced Coating Fundamentals Symposium, TAPPI Press, 2008.
1554. Sesetyan, T., “Testing equipment,” Label & Narrow Web, 6, 36-43, (Jan 2001).
689. Sessler, G.M., J.E. West, F.W. Ryan, and H. Schonhorn, “Increase of gold-teflon FEP joint strength by electron bombardment,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 17, 3199-3209, (1973).
1277. Seto, F., Y. Muraoka, N. Sakamoto, A. Kishida, and M. Akashi, “Surface modification of synthetic fiber nonwoven fabrics with poly(acrylic acid) chains prepared by corona discharge induced grafting,” Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie, 266, 56-62, (May 1999).
1028. Seto, F., Y. Muraoka, T. Akagi, A. Kishida, and M. Akashi, “Surface grafting of poly(vinylamine) onto poly(ethylene) film by corona discharge-induced grafting,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 72, 1583-1587, (Jun 1999).
979. Seung-Goo, L., K. Tae-Jin, and Y. Tae-Ho, “Enhanced interfacial adhesion of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibres by oxygen plasma treatment,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 12, 731-748, (1998).
2900. Seveno, D., A. Vaillant, R. Rioboo, H. Adao, J. Conti, and J. DeConinck, “Dynamics of wetting revisited,” Langmuir, 25, 13034-13044, (Oct 2009).
We present new spreading-drop data obtained over four orders of time and apply our new analysis tool G-Dyna to demonstrate the specific range over which the various models of dynamic wetting would seem to apply for our experimental system. We follow the contact angle and radius dynamics of four liquids on the smooth silica surface of silicon wafers or PET from the first milliseconds to several seconds. Analysis of the images allows us to make several hundred contact angle and droplet radius measurements with great accuracy. The G-Dyna software is then used to fit the data to the relevant theory (hydrodynamic, molecular-kinetic theory, Petrov and De Ruijter combined models, and Shikhmurzaev’s formula). The distributions, correlations, and average values of the free parameters are analyzed and it is shown that for the systems studied even with very good data and a robust fitting procedure, it may be difficult to make reliable claims as to the model which best describes results for a given system. This conclusions also suggests that claims based on smaller data sets and less stringent fitting procedures should be treated with caution.
2100. Severini, F., L. Di Landro, L. Galfetti, L. Meda, G. Ricca, and G. Zenere, “Flame surface modification of polyethylene sheets,” Macromolecular Symposia, 181, 225-244, (May 2002).
2333. Severn, I.D., and S.L. Burring, “The wetting properties of lithographic printing surfaces,” in Wetting, Spreading and Adhesion, Padday, J.F., ed., 403-421, Academic Press, 1978.
328. Sewell, J.H., “Polymer critical surface tensions,” Modern Plastics, 48, 66-72, (Jun 1971).
329. Shafrin, E.G., and W.A. Zisman, “Constitutive relations in the wetting of low energy surfaces and the theory of the retraction method of preparing monolayers,” J. Physical Chemistry, 64, 519-524, (1960).
2090. Shafrin, E.G., and W.A. Zisman, “The spreading of liquids on low-energy surfaces IV: Monolayer coatings on platinum,” J. Colloid Science, 7, 166-177, (Apr 1952).
2773. Shafrin, E.G., and W.A. Zisman, “Critical surface tension for spreading on a liquid substrate,” J. Physical Chemistry, 71, 1309-1316, (1967).
2776. Shafrin, E.G., and W.A. Zisman, “Upper limits for the contact angles of liquids and solids (NRL Report 5985),” U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Sep 1963.
568. Shah, B.A., “The effect of interfacial chemical interactions in interlayer adhesion of packaging structures,” in 1989 Polymers, Laminations and Coatings Conference Proceedings, 789-792, TAPPI Press, Aug 1989.
713. Shahidzadeh-Ahmadi, N., F. Arefi-Khonsari, M.M. Chehimi, and J. Amouroux, “Modification of the physicochemical properties of oxygen plasma treated polypropylene,” Presented at First International Congress on Adhesion Science and Technology, Oct 1995.
1148. Shanahan, M.E.R., “Surface characterization by contact angles - polymers,” in Handbook of Adhesion, 2nd Ed., Packham, D.E., ed., 511-514, John Wiley & Sons, Jul 2005.
1151. Shanahan, M.E.R., “Wetting and spreading,” in Handbook of Adhesion, 2nd Ed., Packham, D.E., ed., 592-594, John Wiley & Sons, Jul 2005.
1642. Shanahan, M.E.R., “Effects of surface flaws on the wettability of solids,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Robert J. Good, Mittal, K.L., ed., 159-171, VSP, Nov 1993.
664. Shanahan, M.E.R., and A. Carre, “Retarded wetting and dewetting on elastomeric substrates,” in First International Congress on Adhesion Science and Technology: Festschrift in Honor of Dr. K.L. Mittal on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday, van Ooij, W.J., and H.R. Anderson Jr., eds., 239-253, VSP, 1998.
1901. Shanahan, M.E.R., and J.M. Di Meglio, “Wetting hysteresis: Effects due to shadowing,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 8, 1371-1380, (1994) (also in Fundamentals of Adhesion and Interfaces, D.S. Rimai, L.P. DeMejo, and K.L. Mittal, eds., p. 225-234, VSP, Dec 1995).
1615. Shanahan, M.E.R., and P.G. deGennes, “Equilibrium of the triple line solid/liquid/fluid of a sessile drop,” in Adhesion 11, Allen, K.W., ed., 71-81, Elsevier, 1987.
1966. Sharma, A.K., and H. Yasuda, “Effect of surface energetics of substrates on adhesion characteristics of poly(p-xylylenes),” J. Adhesion, 13, 201-214, (Apr 1982).
330. Sharma, M.K., “Surface phenomena in coatings and printing technology,” in Surface Phenomena and Fine Particles in Water-Based Coatings and Printing Technology, Sharma, M.K., and F.J. Micale, eds., 1-26, Plenum Press, Jun 1991.
331. Sharma, M.K., ed., Surface Phenomena and Additives in Water-Based Coatings and Printing Technology, Plenum Press, Feb 1992.
1110. Sharon, K., “Special treatment,” Package Printing, 52, 30-34, (Jan 2005).
1166. Sharon, K., “Time to bump the bump treating?,” Package Printing, 53, 32-37, (Jan 2006).
332. Sharp, K.A., A. Nichols, R.F. Fine, and B. Honig, “Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects,” Science, 252, 106-109, (Apr 1989).
1000. Sharpe, L.H., “Wettability and adhesion revisited,” in Adhesion '99, 19-24, Institute of Materials, 1999.
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->