ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 56 of 76, ordered by
320. Schonhorn, H., and F.W. Ryan, “Effects of morphology in the surface region of polymers on adhesion and adhesive joint strength,” J. Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 6, 231-240, (1968).
323. Schonhorn, H., and F.W. Ryan, “Effect of polymer surface morphology on adhesion and adhesive joint strength, II. FEP Teflon and nylon 6,” J. Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 7, 105-111, (1969).
324. Schonhorn, H., and F.W. Ryan, “Surface crosslinking of polyethylene and adhesive joint strength,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 18, 235-243, (1974).
1836. Schonhorn, H., and F.W. Ryan, “Wettability of polyethylene single crystal aggregates,” J. Physical Chemistry, 70, 3811-3815, (Dec 1966).
317. Schonhorn, H., and L.H. Sharpe, “Surface energetics, adhesion, and adhesive joints, III. Surface tension of molten polyethylene,” J. Polymer Science, 3, Part A, 569-573, (1965).
318. Schonhorn, H., and L.H. Sharpe, “Surface energetics, adhesion, and adhesive joints, IV. Joints between epoxy adhesives and chlorotrifluoroethylene copolymer and terpolymer (Aclar),” J. Polymer Science, 3, Part A, 3087-3097, (1965).
1840. Schonhorn, H., and L.H. Sharpe, “Surface tension of molten polypropylene,” J. Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 3, 235-237, (1965).
319. Schonhorn, H., and R.H. Hansen, “Surface treatment of polymers for adhesive bonding,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 11, 1461-1473, (1967).
322. Schonhorn, H., and R.H. Hansen, “Surface treatment of polymers, II. Effectiveness of fluorination as a surface treatment for polyethylene,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 12, 1231-1237, (1968).
1518. Schonhorn, H., et al, “Surface modification of polymers and practical adhesion,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 17, 440-449, (1977).
1098. Schrader, M.E., “Effect of adsorbed vapor on liquid-solid adhesion,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 67-94, VSP, Nov 2003.
325. Schrader, M.E., and G.I. Loeb, eds., Modern Approaches to Wettability: Theory and Applications, Plenum Press, Oct 1992.
878. Schramm, L.L., Dictionary of Colloid and Interface Science, Wiley-Interscience, Jan 2001.
1956. Schreiber, H.P., “Specific interactions and contact angle measurements on polymer solids,” J. Adhesion, 37, 51-61, (Feb 1992).
1970. Schreiber, H.P., M.D. Croucher, and C. Prairie, “On multi-valued surface properties of PMMA films,” J. Adhesion, 11, 107-112, (1980).
558. Schreiber, H.P., and F. Ewane-Ebele, “On the surface tension and its temperature variation in film-forming polymers,” J. Adhesion, 9, 175+, (1978).
2046. Schreiber, H.P., and M.D. Croucher, “Surface characteristics of solvent-cast polymers,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 25, 1961-1968, (Sep 1980).
559. Schreiber, H.P., et al, “Inverse gas chromatography (IGC): a versatile tool for polymer surface characterization,” in ANTEC 95, Society of Plastics Engineers, Apr 1995.
2101. Schroder, K., A. Meyer-Plath, D. Keller, W. Besch, G. Babucke, and A. Ohi, “Plasma-induced surface functionalization of polymeric biomaterials in ammonia plasma,” Contributions to Plasma Physics, 41, 562-572, (2001).
694. Schubert, G., “Adhesion of coatings to aluminum foil - a sticky issue,” in 2002 PLACE Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, Sep 2002.
2571. Schubert, G., “Adhesion to foil: More than just a one-sided story,” in 2008 PLACE Conference Proceedings, 1123-1152, TAPPI Press, Sep 2008.
1105. Schubert, G., and O. Plassmann, “Shedding a new light on corona-treated alu-foil,” in 2004 PLACE Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, Sep 2004.
560. Schuelke, G.W., “Corona treatment: troubleshooting your system,” in 1987 Polymers, Laminations and Coatings Conference Proceedings, 217-219, TAPPI Press, Aug 1987.
1407. Schuelke, G.W., “Modern trends in corona treating,” in 1984 Polymers, Laminations and Coatings Conference Proceedings, 249+, TAPPI Press, Aug 1984.
561. Schultz, J., K. Tsutsumi, and J.B. Donnet, “Surface properties of high-energy solids, I. Determination of the dispersive component of the surface free energy of mica and its energy of adhesion to water and n-alkanes,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 59, 272-276, (1977).
562. Schultz, J., K. Tsutsumi, and J.B. Donnet, “Surface properties of high-energy solids, II. Determination of the nondispersive component of the surface free energy of mica and its energy of adhesion to polar liquids,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 59, 277-282, (1977).
326. Schultz, J., and M. Nardin, “Determination of the surface energy of solids by the two-liquid-phase method,” in Modern Approaches to Wettability: Theory and Applications, Schrader, M.E., and G.I. Loeb, eds., 73-100, Plenum Press, Oct 1992.
751. Schultz, J., and M. Nardin, “Theories and mechanisms of adhesion,” in Handbook of Adhesive Technology, Mittal, K.L., and A. Pizzi, eds., 19-34, Marcel Dekker, May 1994 (also in Handbook of Adhesive Technology, 2nd Ed., A. Pizzi and K.L. Mittal, eds., p. 53-68, Marcel Dekker, Aug 2003).
2059. Schuman, T., B. Adolfsson, M. Wikstrom, and M. Rigdahl, “Surface treatment and printing properties of dispersion-coated paperboard,” Progress in Organic Coatings, 54, 188-197, (Nov 2005).
Paperboard was coated on a pilot scale using aqueous dispersions of styrene–butadiene (SB) copolymers in order to improve its surface characteristics (including printability) and barrier properties with regard to the transmission of water vapour. Coating the paperboard with the dispersion in two steps gave a smoother surface with a remarkable increase in gloss. The printing properties of the smoother double-coated surface were slightly better than those of the single-coated surface. Paraffin wax added to the latex dispersion reduced the water vapour transmission rate (WVTR) but had a negative effect on the printability of the board.
The effect of two commonly used surface treatment techniques (corona and plasma at atmospheric pressure) on the printing and barrier properties of dispersion-coated (containing wax) paperboard was evaluated. A fairly intense corona treatment led to an undesirable increase in the WVTR-value. A less intense corona treatment preserved the WVTR-value to a great extent, but the printability remained at an unsatisfactory level. With plasma treatment, the water vapour barrier was not impaired, and the printability of the plasma-treated dispersion-coated (wax-containing) substrate was good. It is suggested that a better result using corona treatment may be obtained by optimising the power and controlling the time between the treatment and the printing, although this was not investigated here.
1663. Schussler, J., “Ensuring that folding box seams do not burst,” VR Verpackungs-Rundschau, 56-57, (Jun 2006).
1348. Schut, J.H., “Plasma treatment: The better bond,” Plastics Technology, 38, 64-69, (Oct 1992).
1396. Schwab, F.C., et al, “Effect of resin additives on corona treatment of polyethylene,” in 1985 Polymers, Laminations and Coatings Conference Proceedings, 95, TAPPI Press, Aug 1985 (also in J. Plastic Film and Sheeting, V. 2, p. 119+. 1986).
1992. Schwartz, A.M., “Contact angle hysteresis: A molecular interpretation,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 75, 404-408, (Jun 1980).
327. Schwartz, A.M., and S.B. Tejada, “Studies of dynamic contact angles on solids,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 38, 359-375, (1972).
564. Schwartz, J., “The importance of low dynamic surface tension in waterborne coatings,” J. Coatings Technology, 64, 65-73, (Sep 1992).
1121. Sciarratta, V., D. Hegemann, M. Muller, U. Vohrer, and C. Oehr, “Upscaling of plasma processes for carboxyl functionalization,” in Plasma Processes and Polymers, d'Agostino, R., P. Favia, C. Oehr, and M.R. Wertheimer, eds., 39-64, Wiley-VCH, 2005.
565. Seaman, R., “Surface preparation by corona discharge: clean, green, and cost-effective,” in Decorating Div. ANTEC 1995, Society of Plastics Engineers, 1995.
1926. Sedev, R., M. Fabretto, and J. Ralston, “Wettability and surface energetics of rough fluoropolymer surfaces,” J. Adhesion, 80, 497-520, (Jun 2004).
Hydrophobic solid surfaces with controlled roughness were prepared by coating glass slides with an amorphous fluoropolymer (Teflon® AF1600, DuPont) containing varying amounts of silica spheres (diameter 48 μm). Quasi-static advancing, θA, and receding, θR, contact angles were measured with the Wilhelmy technique. The contact angle hysteresis was significant but could be eliminated by subjecting the system to acoustic vibrations. Surface roughness affects all contact angles, but only the vibrated ones, θV, agree with the Wenzel equation. The contact angle obtained by averaging the cosines of θA and θR is a good approximation for θV, provided that roughness is not too large or the angles too small. Zisman's approach was employed to obtain the critical surface tension of wetting (CST) of the solid surfaces. The CST increases with roughness in accordance with Wenzel equation. Advancing, receding, and vibrated angles yield different results. The θA is known to be characteristic of the main hydrophobic component (the fluoropolymer). The θV is a better representation of the average wettability of the surface (including the presence of defects).
1310. Sedev, R.V., J.G. Petrov, and A.W. Neumann, “Effect of swelling of a polymer surface on advancing and receding contact angles,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 180, 36-42, (1996).
1381. Seebock, R., H. Esrom, M. Charbonnier, and M. Romand, “Modification of polyimide in barrier discharge air-plasmas: Chemical and morphological effects,” Plasmas and Polymers, 5, 103-118, (Jun 2000).
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->