ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 42 of 76, ordered by
750. Micale, F.J., S. Sa-Nguandekul, J. Lavelle, and D. Henderson, “Dynamic wetting of water-based inks in flexographic and gravure printing,” in Surface Phenomena and Latexes in Waterborne Coatings and Printing Techonology, Sharma, M.K., ed., 123-138, Plenum Press, Oct 1995.
535. Micale, F.J., et al, “The role of wetting, part 2: flexography,” American Ink Maker, 67, 25-35, (Oct 1989).
814. Michalski, M.-C., J. Hardy, and B.J.V. Saramago, “On the surface free energy of PVC/EVA polymer blends: Comparison of different calculation methods,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 208, 319-328, (1998).
536. Mier, M.A., and C.G. Seefried, “Surface characterization of corona treated polyethylene films,” in ANTEC 85, Society of Plastics Engineers, 1985.
1235. Mikula, M., Z. Jakubikova, and A. Zahoranova, “Surface and adhesion changes of atmospheric barrier discharge-treated polypropylene in air and nitrogen,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 17, 2097-2110, (2003).
2572. Mikula, M., and M. Cernak, “More effective corona for prepress treatment of polymeric foils,” in Proceedings of the 4th Seminar on Graphic Arts Technology, 82-88, Pardubice, Czech Republic, 2001.
930. Mikulec, M., “Olefinic color coats eliminate TPO pretreatment,” Plastics Engineering, 53, 41-42, (Sep 1997).
761. Milker, R., and A. Koch, “Surface treatment of polymer webs by fluorine,” in Coatings Technology Handbook, Satas, D., ed., 303-309, Marcel Dekker, 1991 (also in Coatings Technology Handbook, 2nd Ed., D. Satas and A.A. Tracton, eds., p. 359-365, Marcel Dekker, Jan 2001, and Coatings Technology: Fundamentals, Testing, and Processing Techniques, A.A. Tracton, ed., p. 41/1-41/6, CRC Press, Oct 2006).
457. Miller, A., “Unit operation 1 - surface treatment of substrates,” in Converting for Flexible Packaging, 23-34, Technomic, 1994.
1593. Miller, C.A., and P. Neogi, “Fundamentals of wetting, contact angle, and adsorption,” in Interfacial Phenomena: Equilibrium and Dynamic Effects, 2nd Ed., 61-107, CRC Press, Oct 2007.
1729. Miller, J.D., “Surface chemistry measurements for evaluating coatings formulations,” Franklin International, 2007.
988. Miller, J.D., S. Veeramasuneni, J. Drelich, M.R. Yalamanchili, and G. Yamauchi, “Effect of roughness as determined by atomic force microscopy on the wetting properties of PTFE thin films,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 36, 1849-1855, (Jul 1996).
2673. Miller, M., “Surface energy matchmaking,” http://www.pffc-online.com/coat-lam/9717-surface-energy-matchmaking-0801, Aug 2011.
2880. Miller, M., “The effects of surface treatment at the coating-head interface,” Converting Quarterly, 11, 60-63, (Oct 2021).
763. Miller, R., and V.B. Fainerman, “The drop volume technique,” in Drops and Bubbles in Interfacial Research, Mobius, D., and R. Miller, eds., 139-186, Elsevier, Jun 1998.
238. Miller, S.A., H. Luo, S.J. Pachuta, and R.G. Cooks, “Soft-landing of polyatomic ions at fluorinated self-assembled monolayer surfaces,” Science, 275, 1447-1449, (Mar 1997).
2633. Mills, P., and A. Stecher, “Overcoming adhesion failures of UV coatings with atmospheric plasma treatment,” Coatings World, 20, 68-71, (Oct 2015).
239. Millward, J., “A trick to treat?,” Package Printing, 48, 40-45, (Jan 2001).
240. Millward, J., “Surface treating lab report,” Package Printing, 49, 24-28, (Jan 2002).
2086. Minzari, D., P. Moller, P. Kingshott, L.H. Christensen, and R. Ambat, “Surface oxide formation during corona discharge of AA 1050 aluminum surfaces,” Corrosion Science, 50, 1321-1330, (May 2008).
Atmospheric plasmas have traditionally been used as a non-chemical etching process for polymers, but the characteristics of these plasmas could very well be exploited for metals for purposes more than surface cleaning that is presently employed. This paper focuses on how the corona discharge process modifies aluminium AA 1050 surface, the oxide growth and resulting corrosion properties. The corona treatment is carried out in atmospheric air. Treated surfaces are characterized using XPS, SEM/EDS, and FIB-FESEM and results suggest that an oxide layer is grown, consisting of mixture of oxide and hydroxide. The thickness of the oxide layer extends to 150–300 nm after prolonged treatment. Potentiodynamic polarization experiments show that the corona treatment reduces anodic reactivity of the surface significantly and a moderate reduction of the cathodic reactivity.
1236. Miralai, S.F., E. Monette, R. Bartnikas, G. Czeremuszkin, et al, “Electrical and optical diagnostics of dielectric barrier discharges (DBD) in He and N2 for polymer treatment,” Plasmas and Polymers, 5, 63-77, (Jun 2000).
2407. Miranda, R., “Double corona treatment,” U.S. Patent 6190741, Feb 2001.
2379. Mita, F., K. Kitagawa, T. Arakawa, and S. Simizu, “Method of checking the degree of plasma treatment,” U.S. Patent 4740383, Apr 1988.
671. Mittal, K.L., ed., Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 2, VSP, Sep 2002.
2573. Mix, R., H. Yin, J.F. Friedrich, and A. Rau, “Polypropylene-aluminum adhesion by aerosol based DBD treatment of foils,” in Proceedings of the Third Asian Conference on Adhesion, 28-31, Society for Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009.
2524. Mix, R., J.F. Friedrich, and A.Rau, “Polymer surface modification by aerosol based DBD treatment of foils,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, 6, 566-574, (Sep 2009).
The effect of different nebulized liquids directly introduced into the dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) was compared with simple air DBD treatment of polyethylene foils. Water, alcohols and aqueous solutions of different organic substances (environmentally compatible) and water soluble polymers were applied as aerosols and injected into the DBD zone. The DBD residence time (number of treatment cycles) and the power were varied. The durability of the surface modification effect was studied after removing of Low-Molecular Weight Oxidized Material (LMWOM) by washing the samples with water and ethanol. The modified foils were characterized by XPS and contact angle measurements as a function of the applied plasma conditions. The concentration of functional groups at modified surfaces was estimated by derivatization and subsequent XPS measurement.
2523. Mix, R., J.F. Friedrich, and N. Inagaki, “Modification of branched polyethylene by aerosol-assisted dielectric barrier discharge,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, 9, 406-416, (Apr 2012).
Three polyethylene (PE) types with different branching structures were subjected to air, water and ethanol aerosol-assisted dielectric barrier discharges (DBD) for surface modification. Using the air DBD the incorporated oxygen concentration was found to be independent on the branching of PE in contrast to the introduction of OH groups, which was PE-2 > PE-1 > PE-3. For water-aerosol DBD the succession of OH concentration was in the order of PE-1 > PE-2 > PE-3. Ethanol aerosol-assisted DBD produced the lowest concentration of OH groups also independent on the branching of PE. The chemical nature of introduced oxygen functional groups was inspected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and assigned as C
O, >C
O/CHO/OCO and OCO.
2772. Miyama, M., Y. Yang, T. Yasuda, T. Okuno, and H.K. Yasuda, “Static and dynamic contact angles of water on polymeric surfaces,” Langmuir, 13, 5494-5503, (Oct 1997).
2014. Moghaddam, H.A., and A. Mirhabibi, “A developed method for studying the surface energy variation on high density polyethylene,” Iranian Polymer J., 13, 485-494, (2004).
In the gas flame treatment of low surface free energy (SE) substrates, such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE), problems might arise from under or over flaming, oxygen concentration differences in and around of the flame, etc. Consequently, in printing applications, the possible variation of induced SE existing on the surface, could cause distortion on printed letters. In this research, a new method based on the wetting and spreading phenomena was developed to display and study details of the SE variation on HDPE flame treated substrates. It was an easy and quick method. Results showed good agreements with previous works done on the flame treatment characteristics. The optimal flaming was achieved, while the substrate surface had been positioned about 10 to 12 mm below the tip of the flame's blue part. Also when the flaming speed had been controlled about 80 mm/s. Results from the adhesion strength test supported the optimum situations found previously by others. It was hoped that this new method could also be capable of estimating the critical SE of solid surfaces in future works.
1425. Molina, R., E. Bertran, M.R. Julia, and P. Erra, “Wettability of surface-modified keratin fibers,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 321-333, VSP, Jul 2006.
1237. Molinie, P., “Charge injection in corona-charged polymeric films: Potential decay and current measurements,” J. Electrostatics, 45, 265-273, (Feb 1999).
2424. Montazavi, S.H., M. Ghoranneviss, and A.H. Sari, “Argon/hexamethyldisiloxane plasma effects on polypropylene film surface properties,” J. Fusion Energy, 29, 499-502, (2010).
In this work a DC plasma reactor was used for deposition of plasma polymerized coating from hexamethyldisiloxane-Ar (35/65%) mixture on polypropylene films. Surface energy parameter have been calculated using Owens-Wendt approaches with the sessile drop method are used to obtain the dispersive γD and polar γP component of surface free energy. The surface morphology of samples were investigated using scanning electron microscope. Also the chemical properties and wetability of prepared samples were tested using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and contact angle measurement, respectively.
1014. Moon, S.I., and J. Jang, “Effect of the oxygen plasma treatment of UHMWPE fibre on the transverse properties of UHMWPE-fibre/vinyl ester composites,” Composites Science & Technology, 59, 487-493, (Mar 1999).
1017. Moon, S.I., and J. Jang, “Factors affecting the interfacial adhesion of ultrahigh-modulus polyethylene fibre-vinylester composites using gas plasma treatment,” J. Materials Science, 33, 3419-3425, (Jul 1998).
953. Moore, M.J., “Surface energy measurements and their application to rubber-to-metal bonding,” Presented at The 145th Meeting of the Rubber Division of the American Chemical Society, 1994.
1618. Morelock, C.R., Y. Htet, L.L. Wright, and E.C. Culbertson, “AFM studies of corona-treated, biaxially oriented PET film,” Converting, 25, 40-48, (Dec 2007).
2490. Moreno-Couranjou, M., N.D. Boscher, D. Duday, R. Maurau, E. Lecoq, and P. Choquet, “Atmospheric pressure plasma polymerization surface treatments by dielectric barrier discharge for enhanced polymer-polymer and metal-polymer adhesion,” in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Polymers, Thomas, M., and K.L. Mittal, eds., 219-250, Scrivener, 2013.
2984. Morent, R., N. De Geyter, C. Leys, L. Gengembre, and E. Payen, “Study of the ageing behaviour of polymer films treated with a dielectric barrier discharge in air, helium and argon at medium pressure,” Surface and Coatings Technology, 201, 7847-7854, (Jun 2007).
2357. Morgan, A.W., “Method of selectively treating a plastic film to improve anchorage characteristics,” U.S. Patent 3391070, Jul 1968.
1083. Morgan, W., “Why do I need corona treating & how does it work?,” Inside The FTA, (Aug 2004).
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->