ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 24 of 76, ordered by
1214. Guimond, S., I. Radu, G. Czeremuszkin, D.J. Carlsson, and M.R. Wertheimer, “Biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) surface modification by nitrogen atmospheric pressure glow discharge (APGD) and by air corona,” Plasmas and Polymers, 7, 71-88, (Mar 2002).
2574. Guimond, S., I. Radu, G. Czeremuszkin, and M.R. Wertheimer, “Modification of polyolefins in nitrogen atmospheric pressure glow discharges,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on High Pressure Low Temperature Plasma Chemistry, 400-404, Puhajarve, Estonia, 2002.
1269. Guimond, S., and M.R. Wertheimer, “Surface degradation and hydrophobic recovery of polyolefins treated by air corona and nitrogen atmospheric pressure glow discharge,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 94, 1291-1303, (Nov 2004).
The surface degradation and production of low molecular weight oxidized materials (LMWOM) on biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) films was investigated and compared for two different dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) treatment types, namely air corona and nitrogen atmospheric pressure glow discharge (N2 APGD). Contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) analyses were performed in conjunction with rinsing the treated films in water. It is shown that N2 APGD treatments of both polyolefins result in much less surface degradation, therefore, allowing for a significantly higher degree of functionalization and better wettability. Hydrophobic recovery of the treated films has also been studied by monitoring their surface energy (γs) over a period of time extending up to several months after treatment. Following both surface modification techniques, the treated polyolefin films were both found to undergo hydrophobic recovery; however, for N2 APGD modified surfaces, γs ceases to decrease after a few days and attains a higher stable value than in the case of air corona treated films. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 1291–1303, 2004
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/app.21134
147. Guiseppe-Elie, A., G.E. Wnek, and S.P. Wesson, “Wettabililty of polyacetylene: surface energetics and determination of material properties,” Langmuir, 2, 508-513, (1986).
1684. Gulejova, B., M. Simor, J. Rahel, D. Kovacik, and M. Cernak, “Hydrophilization of polyester nonwoven fabrics by atmospheric nitrogen plasma treatment,” Czech J. Physics, Supplement D, 52, 861-865, (2002).
148. Gunnerson, R., “An aura of power,” Package Printing, 40, 24+, (Aug 1993).
1757. Guo, C., S. Wang, H. Liu, L. Feng, Y. Song, and L. Jiang, “Wettability alteration of polymer surfaces produced by scraping,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 22, 395-402, (2008).
In this paper, we present a simple, yet novel, method, utilizing scraping to obtain continuous rough microstructures over large areas, leading to a tunable wettability conversion from hydrophilicity to superhydrophobicity on polymer surfaces. A series of polymers ranging from hydrophobic to hydrophilic were used, and we found that the wettability of these polymer surfaces could be modified by the scraping process, irrespective of their hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity. More importantly, those polymers with contact angle ranging from 65° to 90° on their smooth surfaces also exhibit enhanced hydrophobicity after scraping. Our results indicate that 65° is the critical value which is more suitable to define hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity for polymer materials.
2973. Gupta, B., J. Hilborn, C. Hollenstein, C.J.G. Plummer, R. Houriet, and N. Xanthopoulus, “Surface modification of polyester films by RF plasma,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 78, 1083-1091, (Aug 2000).
1504. Gupta, B.N., “Contribution of plasma in vacuum Al metallized polyester film,” in AIMCAL 2006 Fall Technical Conference, AIMCAL, Oct 2006.
2779. Gupta, B.S., and H.S. Whang, “Surface wetting and energy properties of cellulose acetate, polyester, and polypropylene fibers,” in 1998 Nonwovens Conference and Trade Fair, 65-78, TAPPI Press, 1998.
2615. Gururaj, T., R. Subasri, K.R.C. Soma Raju, and G. Padmanabham, “Effect of plasma pretreatment on adhesion and mechanical properties of UV-curable coatings on plastics,” Applied Surface Science, 257, 4360-4364, (Feb 2011).
An attempt was made to study the effect of plasma surface activation on the adhesion of UV-curable sol-gel coatings on polycarbonate (PC) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) substrates. The sol was synthesized by the hydrolysis and condensation of a UV-curable silane in combination with Zr-n-propoxide. Coatings deposited by dip coating were cured using UV-radiation followed by thermal curing between 80 °C and 130 °C. The effect of plasma surface treatment on the wettability of the polymer surface prior to coating deposition was followed up by measuring the water contact angle. The water contact angle on the surface of as-cleaned substrates was 80° ± 2° and that after plasma treatment was 43° ± 1° and 50° ± 2° for PC and PMMA respectively. Adhesion as well as mechanical properties like scratch resistance and taber abrasion resistance were evaluated for coatings deposited over plasma treated and untreated surfaces.
2068. Guruvenket, S., G. Mohan Rao, M. Komath, and A.M. Raichur, “Plasma surface modification of polystyrene and polyethylene,” Applied Surface Science, 236, 278-284, (Sep 2004).
Polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE) samples were treated with argon and oxygen plasmas. Microwave electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) was used to generate the argon and oxygen plasmas and these plasmas were used to modify the surface of the polymers. The samples were processed at different microwave powers and treatment time and the surface modification of the polymer was evaluated by measuring the water contact angle of the samples before and after the modification. Decrease in the contact angle was observed with the increase in the microwave power for both polystyrene and polyethylene. Plasma parameters were assessed using Langmuir probe measurements. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed the evidence for the induction of oxygen-based functional groups in both polyethylene and polystyrene when treated with the oxygen plasma. Argon treatment of the polymers showed improvement in the wettability which is attributed to the process called as CASING, on the other hand the oxygen plasma treatment of the polymers showed surface functionalization. Correlation between the plasma parameters and the surface modification of the polymer is also discussed.
1372. Guthrie, J.T., “Pretreatments and their effect on the adhesion of coatings,” Surface Coatings Intl. B: Coatings Transactions, 85, 27-33, (Mar 2002).
468. Gutowski, W.S., “Thermodynamics of adhesion,” in Fundamentals of Adhesion, Lee, L.-H, ed., 87-135, Plenum Press, Feb 1991.
469. Gutowski, W.S., “Novel surface treatment process for enhanced adhesion of ultra-high modulus PE fibres to epoxy resins,” Composite Interfaces, 1, 141-151, (1993).
661. Gutowski, W.S., S. Li, L. Russell, C. Filippou, M. Spicer, and P. Hoobin, “Molecular brush concepts in surface engineering of polymers for enhanced adhesion of adhesives and polymeric coatings,” in Adhesive Joints: Formation, Characteristics and Testing, Vol. 2, Mittal, K.L., ed., 3-48, VSP, 2002.
1287. Ha, S.W., R. Hauert, K.-H. Ernst, and E. Wintermantel, “Surface analysis of chemically-etched and plasma-treated PEEK for biomedical applications,” Surface and Coatings Technology, 96, 293-299, (1997).
2221. Hablewitz, R., “Surface treatment, sustainability go beyond skin deep,” Flexible Packaging, 12, 42, (Apr 2010).
149. Hahn, M.T., “Ceramic rollers for corona treating,” Flexo, 19, 134-136, (May 1994).
2358. Hailstone, R.B., “Process of treating polyvinylbutyral sheeting by an electrical discharge in nitrogen to reduce blocking,” U.S. Patent 3407130, Oct 1968.
150. Haley, P.J., and M.J. Miksis, “The effect of the contact line on droplet spreading,” J. Fluid Mechanics, 223, 57-81, (Feb 1991).
1288. Hall, J.R., C.A.L. Westerdahl, A.T. Devine, and M.J. Bodnar, “Activated gas plasma surface treatment of polymers for adhesive bonding,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 13, 2085-2096, (1969).
2327. Hall, J.R., C.A.L. Westerdahl, M.J. Bodnar, and D.W. Levi, “Effect of activated gas plasma treatment time on adhesive bondability of polymers,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 16, 1465-1477, (Jun 1972).
2219. Hall, J.R., C.A.L. Westerdahl, and M.J. Bodnar, “Activated gas plasma surface treatment of polymers for adhesive bonding,” in Picatinny Arsenal Technology Report 4001, 0, Picatinny Arsenal, 1969.
2583. Halle, R.W., “Polymer and processing parameters influencing the heat sealability of polyethylene,” in 1989 Polymers, Laminations and Coatings Conference Proceedings, 799-806, TAPPI Press, 1989.
1484. Hamaker, H.C., “The London van der Waals attraction between spherical particles,” Physica, 4, 1058-1072, (1937).
1798. Hamilton, W.C., “A technique for the characterization of hydrophilic solid surfaces,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 40, 219-222, (Aug 1972).
2004. Hamilton, W.C., “Measurement of the polar force contribution to adhesive bonding,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 47, 672-675, (Jun 1974).
2410. Hammen, R.R., and D.V. Rundberg, “Multi-mode treater with internal air cooling system,” U.S. Patent 6429595, Aug 2002.
1160. Han, J.H., Y. Zhang, and R. Buffo, “Surface chemistry of food, packaging and biopolymer materials,” in Innovations in Food Packaging, Han, J.H., ed., 45-60, Elsevier, Nov 2005.
2069. Han, S., W.-K. Choi, K.H. Yoon, S.-K. Koh, “Surface reaction on polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF) irradiated by low energy ion beam in reactive gas environment,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 72, 41-47, (1999).
470. Hansen, C.M., “The three dimensional solubility parameter - key to paint component affinities, I. Solvents, plasticizers, polymers, and resins,” J. Paint Technology, 39, 104+, (1967).
471. Hansen, C.M., “The three dimensional solubility parameter - key to paint component affinities, II. Dyes, emulsifiers, mutual solubility and compatability, and pigments,” J. Paint Technololgy, 39, 505-510, (1967).
472. Hansen, C.M., “The three dimensional solubility parameter - key to paint component affinities, III. Independent calculation of the parameter components,” J. Paint Technology, 39, 511+, (1967).
473. Hansen, C.M., “Characterization of surfaces by spreading liquids,” J. Paint Technology, 42, 660+, (1970).
474. Hansen, C.M., “Surface dewetting and coatings performance,” J. Paint Technology, 44, 57+, (1972).
746. Hansen, C.M., “Cohesion energy parameters applied to surface phenomena,” in Handbook of Surface and Colloid Chemistry, 2nd Ed., Birdi, K.S., ed., 539-554, CRC Press, Sep 2002.
822. Hansen, C.M., Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook, CRC Press, Sep 1999.
872. Hansen, C.M., “Solubility Parameters,” in Paint and Coating Testing Manual, 14th Ed. of the Gardner-Sward Handbook, Koleske, J.V., ed., 383-406, ASTM, 1995.
1568. Hansen, C.M., Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Jul 2007.
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->