Accudynetest logo

Products available online direct from the manufacturer

ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography

Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.

3022 results returned
showing result page 17 of 76, ordered by
 

456. Elwes, E.H., and C. Delahaye, “Adhesion problems associated with coating polypropylene,” Polymer Paint Colour Journal, 181, 151-152, (Mar 1991).

2538. Encinas, N., B. Diaz-Benito, J. Abenojar, and M.A. Martinez, “Extreme durability of wettability changes on polyolefin surface by atmospheric pressure plasma torch,” Surface and Coatings Technology, 205, 396-402, (Oct 2010).

In the present work three common polyolefins: high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE) and polypropylene (PP) have been treated with an atmospheric pressure air plasma torch (APPT) in order to improve their wettability properties. The variations in surface energy (γs), as well as the durability of the treatment are determined by means of contact angle measurements for different aging times after plasma exposure (up to 270 days) using five test liquids which cover a wide range of polarities. The introduction of new polar moieties (carbonyl, amine or hydroxyl) is confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total multiple reflection mode (ATR-FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) provides information on the morphological changes and variation on surface roughness, revealing that smoother, lamellar and semispheric micrometric structures are created on the LDPE, HDPE and PP surfaces, respectively. Results show that APPT treatment enhances both the total and polar components of the γs under study, with an unprecedent stability (> 8 months) in time.

2253. Encinas, N., M. Pantoja, J. Abenojar, and M.A. Martinez, “Control of wettability of polymers by surface roughness modification,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 24, 1869-1883, (2010).

Most polymeric materials, particularly polyolefins and their derivatives, present a low surface energy which is the cause of their poor wettability and limits processes such as adhesive bonding, painting, or metalizing. Many methods have been developed and used to modify polymer surfaces for improved wetting, including mechanical treatments, wet-chemical treatments with strong acids or bases, and exposure to flames or corona discharge. In this paper the improvement of wetting properties of several polymeric materials widely used in the automotive industry, such as high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP) and silicone, is studied by means of surface mechanical abrasion using sandpapers of different grain sizes (1000, 180 and 80). Measurements of the surface roughness are performed using a Hommel Tester T8000 device equipped with a diamond stylus, which provides data on the arithmetic average roughness Ra parameter and Abbott–Firestone curve. Variations in the polymers surface energy (SE) are estimated through contact angle measurements using five test liquids of different polarities. Both components of the SE, dispersion (σD) and polar (σP), as well as total (σT) at different conditions of treatment are analyzed using the Owens–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble (OWRK) method. Morphological changes induced in the surface are analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Additionally, measurements of the static friction coefficient (μs) are carried out by the standard method ASTM D 1894-08. A slight enhancement in surface wettability is found with the mechanical abrasion pre-treatment from the SE increase. Finally, a higher value of μs is achieved for the abraded specimens as the normal force acting onto the system is increased.

634. Engel, J.H. Jr., and R.N. Fitzwater, “Adhesion of surface coatings as determined by the peel method,” in Adhesion and Cohesion, Weiss, P., ed., 89+, Elsevier, 1962.

1611. Erbil, H.Y., and R.A. Meric, “Determination of surface free energy components of polymers from contact angle data via nonlinear programming methods,” in Interfaces in Polymer, Ceramic, and Metal Matrix Composites, Ishida, H., ed., 765-772, Elsevier, 1988.

1064. Eriksson, J.C., and S. Ljunggren, “Thermodynamics of curved interfaces in relation to the Helfrich curvature free energy approach,” in Surface and Interfacial Tension: Measurement, Theory, and Applications, Hartland, S., ed., 547-614, Marcel Dekker, 2004.

699. Espana, J.M., D. Garcia, L. Sanchez, J. Lopez, and R. Balart, “Modification of surface wettability of sodium ionomer sheets via atmospheric plasma treatment,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 52, 2573-2580, (2012).

In this study, atmospheric plasma treatment has been used to modify the wetting properties of ethylene-methacrylic acid sodium ionomer. The effects of the plasma treatment on surface properties of this ionomer have been followed by contact angle measurements, Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). With the use of these techniques, the overall effects on activation–functionalization and surface topography changes have been determined in terms of the processing parameters of the atmospheric plasma treatment (rate and distance). The obtained results show a remarkable increase of the wetting properties and optimum balanced behavior is obtained for atmospheric plasma treatment with a rate of 100 mm/s and a distance of 6 mm; in this case, surface free energy is increased from 33 mJ/m2 (untreated ionomer) up to 62 mJ/m2, maintaining good transparency. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers

1371. Esrom, H., R. Seebock, M. Charbonnier, and M. Romand, “Surface activation of polyimide with dielectric barrier discharge for electroless metal deposition,” Surface and Coatings Technology, 125, 19-24, (Mar 2000).

837. Etzler, F.M., “Determination of the surface free energy of solids,” Reviews of Adhesion and Adhesives, 43, 3-45, (Feb 2013).

Knowledge of the surface free energy of solids is important to understanding a number of processes involving wetting and adhesion to solid surfaces. The measurement of surface free energy has been a subject of active interest for at least 50 years. Despite the importance of the problem to a variety of industries a universally accepted method or set of methods for determination of solid surface free energies has not been agreed upon. In this review article various methods that have been used for the calculation of surface free energies are discussed. The limitations and concerns for employment of each of these methods are furthermore highlighted. Of principal concern is the use of contact angles that meet the requirements to be Young’s contact angles and the mixing of quantities obtained by contact angle measurements with those obtained by IGC, as surface free energies obtained by IGC tend to be larger than those obtained from contact angle measurements. Calculated values from IGC data are presumably larger than those from contact angle data as IGC data are often collected at very low surface coverages.

1097. Etzler, F.M., “Characterization of surface free energies and surface chemistry of solids,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 219-266, VSP, Nov 2003.

1424. Etzler, F.M., “Surface free energy of solids: A comparison of models,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 4, Mittal, K.L., ed., 215-236, VSP, Jul 2006.

783. Etzler, F.M., J. Simmons, N. Ladyzhynsky, V. Thomas, and S. Maru, “Assesment of acid-base character of polymer surfaces from contact angle and other surface chemical data,” in Acid-Base Interactions: Relevance to Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 2, Mittal, K.L., ed., 385-394, VSP, Dec 2000.

1693. Etzler, F.M., J.F. Bobalek, and M.A. Weiss, “Surface free energy of paper and inks: Printability issues,” in Proceedings from the TAGA International Conference, 225-237, TAGA, 1993.

2782. Etzler, F.M., M. Buche, J.F. Bobalek, and M.A. Weiss, “Surface free energy of paper and inks: Printability issues,” in 1995 Papermakers Conference Proceedings, 383-394, TAPPI Press, 1995.

1978. Evans, J.M., “The influence of oxygen on the nitrogen corona treatment of polylefins,” J. Adhesion, 5, 9-16, (Jan 1973).

1979. Evans, J.M., “Nitrogen corona activation of polyethylene,” J. Adhesion, 5, 1-7, (Jan 1973).

1972. Evans, J.R.G., and D.E. Packham, “Adhesion of polyethylene to metals: The role of surface topography,” J. Adhesion, 10, 177-191, (1979).

749. Everaert, E.P., H.C. van der mei, and H.J. Busscher, “XPS analyses of plasma-treated silicone rubber,” in Surface Modification of Polymeric Biomaterials, Ratner, B.D., and D.G. Castner, eds., 89-96, Plenum Press, Mar 1997.

1927. Evieux, J., P. Montois, V. Nassiet, Y. Baziard, J.A. Petit, and R. Dedryv, “Study of bonded plasma-treated polyetherimide components for power integration: Durability in a hot/wet environment,” J. Adhesion, 80, 263-290, (Apr 2004).

This work deals with the study of the durability, in a hot/wet environment, of structural adhesively bonded polyetherimide (PEI) assemblies used in power electronics packaging technology. An overall approach is proposed, for which the epoxy joint-PEI substrates assembly on the one hand, and the adhesive system components (substrate surface and bulk adhesive) on the other hand, are studied separately with different analytical techniques. The first part of this work was devoted to the substrate surface state and to its modification using a cold plasma treatment of the PEI surface. Then for chosen parameters (power, duration) contact angle measurements indicated an increased surface tension resulting from surface decontamination (removal of release agent and carbon contaminants) and from the creation of polar species, such as esters or carboxylic acid groups, on the PEI surface (XPS analyses). The second part of this study concerned the bulk adhesive ageing in an ethylene glycol-water solution at 70°C. Mass uptake measurements versus time showed the liquid diffusion in the bulk adhesive associated with a microscopic damage of the epoxy system. An overall plasticizing of the adhesive with a considerable decay of the α-transition temperature of one of the two adhesive epoxy-amine networks (TGDDM-BAPP) was also highlighted using rheometry. However, in these ageing conditions, the adhesive glassy modulus decreases slighty because of the thermomechanical stability of the other epoxy network. In the third part, the asymmetric wedge test showed the beneficial effect of the cold plasma treatment on the epoxy/PEI interface durability in the aggressive medium.

2027. Ewane-Ebele, F., and H.P. Schreiber, “Measurement and use of surface tension data in film-forming polymers,” J. Oil and Colour Chemists Association, 60, 249-255, (Jul 1977).

676. Extrand, C.W., “Water contact angles and hysteresis on polyamides,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 2, Mittal, K.L., ed., 289-297, VSP, Sep 2002.

1096. Extrand, C.W., “A thermodynamic model for wetting free energies of solids from contact angles,” in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Vol. 3, Mittal, K.L., ed., 211-218, VSP, Nov 2003.

2715. Extrand, C.W., “Uncertainty in contact angle measurements from the tangent method,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 30, 1597-161, (2016).

The uncertainty in contact angles from sessile drops measured by the tangent method was estimated using a standard error propagation technique involving partial derivatives. If contact angles are <60°, then uncertainty of the tangent method appears to be quite small,≤ ± 2°. However, as θ values approach 90°, uncertainty increases asymptotically and can exceed  ±5°.

2717. Extrand, C.W., “Uncertainty in contact angle estimates from a Wilhelmy tensiometer,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 29, 2515-2520, (2015).

The uncertainty in contact angles from the Wilhelmy tensiometer was analyzed using standard error propagation techniques involving partial derivatives across the full range of wettability, from completely wetting to non-wetting surfaces. Uncertainties in force, sample perimeter, and liquid surface tension of 1% were shown to yield uncertainty in contact angles of a few degrees over the middle range of wettability, but exceeded 10° at the extremes.

2895. Extrand, C.W., and S.I. Moon, “Contact angles of liquid drops on super hydrophobic surfaces: Understanding the role of flattening of drops by gravity,” Langmuir, 26, 17090-17099, (Oct 2010).

Measurement of contact angles on super hydrophobic surfaces by conventional methods can produce ambiguous results. Experimental difficulties in constructing tangent lines, gravitational distortion or erroneous assumptions regarding the extent of spreading can lead to underestimation of contact angles. Three models were used to estimate drop shape and perceived contact angles on completely nonwetting super hydrophobic surfaces. One of the models employed the classic numerical solutions from Bashforth and Adams. Additionally, two approximate models were derived as part of this work. All three showed significant distortion of microliter-sized drops and similar trends in perceived contact angles. Liquid drops of several microliters are traditionally used in sessile contact angle measurements. Drops of this size are expected to and indeed undergo significant flattening on super hydrophobic surfaces, even if the wetting interactions are minimal. The distortion is more pronounced if the liquid has a lesser surface tension or greater density. For surfaces that are completely nonwetting, underestimation of contact angles can be tens of degrees. Our modeling efforts suggest that accurate contact angle measurements on super hydrophobic surfaces would require very small sessile drops, on the order of hundreds of picoliters.

2041. Extrand, C.W., and Y. Kumagai, “An experimental study of contact angle hysteresis,” J. Colloid and Interface Science, 191, 378-383, (Jul 1999).

766. Fainerman, V.B., and R. Miller, “The maximum bubble pressure tensiometry,” in Drops and Bubbles in Interfacial Research, Mobius, D., and R. Miller, eds., 279-326, Elsevier, Jun 1998.

2285. Fang, C., and J. Drelich, “Theoretical contact angles on a nano-heterogeneous surface composed of parallel apolar and polar strips,” Langmuir, 20, 6679-6684, (2004).

Neumann−Good's parallel strip model (J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1972, 38, 341) was used to analyze the contact angle hysteresis for a liquid on a heterogeneous surface composed of alternatively aligned horizontal apolar (θ = 70°) and polar (θ = 0°) strips. The critical size of the strip width, below which the contact angle hysteresis disappears, was determined on the basis of the analysis of the activation energy for wetting to be from 6 to 12 nm. This calculated value of the critical strip size is 1 order of magnitude smaller than that of 0.1 μm, which has been commonly considered as the limit of heterogeneity size causing the appearance of the contact angle hysteresis.

1271. Farley, J.M., P. Meka, “Heat sealing of semicrystalline polymer films, III. Effect of corona discharge treatment of LLDPE,” J. Applied Polymer Science, 51, 121-131, (Jan 1994).

2828. Farris, S., S. Pozzoli, P. Biagioni, L. Duo, S. Mancinelli, and L. Piergiovanni, “The fundamentals of flame treatment for the surface activation of polyolefin polymers - A review,” Polymer, 51, 3591-3605, (Jul 2010).

This paper aims to provide an exhaustive and comprehensive overview on flame treatment as a valuable technique for improving the surface properties of polymers, especially polyolefins. It starts with a brief historical excursus on the origin of flame treatment, and the second section deals with the major fundamentals of flame chemistry, with a special focus on the combustion process and mechanism of surface activation. The most important parameters influencing the extent of the oxidation reaction along with relevant practical notes are discussed in the third section. The concluding section outlines how the most significant features of flame treatment can be profitably used to improve the wettability and adhesion properties of polyolefin surfaces, especially from the perspective of developing novel composite solutions such as polyolefins/bio-based coating pairs intended for many different applications.

2992. Fatyeyevah, K., A. Dahi, C. Chappey, D. Langevin, J.-M. Valleton, F. Poncin-Epaillard, and S. Marais, “Effect of cold plasma treatment on surface properties and gas permeability of polyimide films,” RSC Adavnces, Issue 59, (2014).

The surface functionalization of polyimide (Matrimid® 5218) films was carried out by cold plasma treatment with CF4, N2 and O2 gases using a radio frequency discharge and the optimum plasma conditions were evaluated by water contact angle measurements. The surface hydrophobicity of polyimide films was obtained after CF4 plasma treatment, while O2 and N2 plasma treatments contributed to the hydrophilic surface functionalization. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results revealed the presence of CFx, amino or oxygen-containing groups attached to the polyimide film surface depending on the treatment gas. A strong influence of the used plasma gas on the film roughness was determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements. The influence of the surface modification on CO2, N2 and O2 gas permeation through the plasma treated films was evaluated. The permeation behaviour was characterized in terms of transport parameters, namely, coefficients of permeability, diffusion and solubility. The permeability coefficient of all plasma treated polyimide films for the studied gases (CO2, N2 and O2) was found to decrease following the order of increasing the kinetic molecular diameter of the penetrant gas. Besides, the selectivity coefficient was found to be significantly increased after the plasma treatments – αCO2/N2 was increased up to 36% and 98% for O2 and N2 plasma treated Matrimid® 5218 films, respectively. The relationship between the gas permeation behaviour and the surface modification of polymer film by cold plasma was discussed.

1129. Favia, P., A Milella, L. Iacobelli, and R. d'Agostino, “Plasma pretreatments and treatments on polytetrafluoroethylene for reducing the hydrophobic recovery,” in Plasma Processes and Polymers, d'Agostino, R., P. Favia, C. Oehr, and M.R. Wertheimer, eds., 271-280, Wiley-VCH, 2005.

748. Favia,P., F. Palumbo, M.V. Stendardo, and R. d'Agostino, “Plasma-treatments of polymers by NH3-H2 RF glow discharges: coupling plasma and surface diagnostics,” in Surface Modification of Polymeric Biomaterials, Ratner, B.D., and D.G. Castner, eds., 69-77, Plenum Press, Mar 1997.

92. Fay, M.J., and T.D. Allston, “Characterization of vapor deposited aluminum coatings on oriented polypropylene films,” TAPPI J., 77, 125-129, (Apr 1994).

95. Feast, W.J., H.S. Munro, and R.W. Richards, eds., Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces II, John Wiley & Sons, Apr 1993.

93. Feast, W.J., and H.S. Munro, eds., Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces, John Wiley & Sons, 1987.

1940. Feinerman, A.E., Y.S. Lipatov, and V.I. Minkov, “Interfacial interactions in polymers: The dependence of the measured surface tension of solid polymer on the surface tension of wetting liquid,” J. Adhesion, 61, 37-54, (Feb 1997).

1944. Feinerman, A.E., Y.S. Lipatov, and V.I. Minkov, “On the hysteresis of polymer wetting,” J. Adhesion, 56, 97-105, (Apr 1996).

2372. Ferrarini, E., “Corona effect surface treatment apparatus for sheet,” U.S. Patent 4334144, Jun 1982.

1915. Ferreira, L., B. Evangelista, M.C.L. Martins, P.L. Granja, et al, “Improving the adhesion of poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers to poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels by ozone treatment: Surface characterization and pull-out tests,” Polymer, 46, 9840-9850, (Nov 2005).

This work reports a methodology to improve the adhesion between poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) fibers and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) hydrogels by treating PET with ozone. The surface chemistry of PET was examined by water contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (IRAS) and attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) yielding information about the chemical functionalities at depths upon 0.6 μm. Ozone treatment introduces several polar groups in the surface of PET through oxidation and chain scission resulting in increased wettability. These groups include mostly carboxylic and anhydride groups and in small extent hydroxyl groups. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis shows that the surface of ozone-treated PET films is fully covered with spherical particles that are removed after washing the film with water. During the washing step carboxylic functionalities were removed preferentially, as demonstrated by XPS and IR analysis. According to pull-out tests, PET monofilaments and bundles treated by ozone had a higher adhesion to pHEMA hydrogels than untreated ones. The apparent interfacial shear strength is 65% higher on pHEMA hydrogel containing an ozonated than an untreated PET monofilament. In addition, the force to pull-out an ozone-treated PET bundle from pHEMA hydrogel is ca. 81% higher than the one observed for the untreated bundle.

 

<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->

 Build ID built-Jan 3 2011-13:54:18
 Page ID 4254138690
 MGI Version 3.2.3
 MGI Region Path /
 Virtual Host Name dev.accudynetest.com
 Parameter Count 0
 Parameter List 
 Tag Body 
 Page Variable Count 21
 Page Variable List mgiSBShippingTotal="0.00"
 bibVar_Page="17"
 tIndex="8"
 bibVar_ResultCount="3022"
 prevURL="bibliography2.html?pageID=16&bibsort=author"
 nextURL="bibliography2.html?pageID=18&bibsort=author"
 bibsort="author"
 bibVar_LastPage="76"
 token=""
 mgiSBSubtotal="0.00"
 bibVar_FirstIndex="641"
 bibVar_PrevPage="16"
 textURL="bibliography2.html?pageID=76&bibsort=author"
 bibVar_NextPage="18"
 searchstring="NOT auth='' ORDER BY auth"
 mgiSBTotal="0.00"
 numberURL="| <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=1&bibsort=author" class="numURL">1</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=2&bibsort=author" class="numURL">2</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=3&bibsort=author" class="numURL">3</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=4&bibsort=author" class="numURL">4</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=5&bibsort=author" class="numURL">5</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=6&bibsort=author" class="numURL">6</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=7&bibsort=author" class="numURL">7</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=8&bibsort=author" class="numURL">8</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=9&bibsort=author" class="numURL">9</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=10&bibsort=author" class="numURL">10</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=11&bibsort=author" class="numURL">11</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=12&bibsort=author" class="numURL">12</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=13&bibsort=author" class="numURL">13</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=14&bibsort=author" class="numURL">14</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=15&bibsort=author" class="numURL">15</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=16&bibsort=author" class="numURL">16</a> | 17 | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=18&bibsort=author" class="numURL">18</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=19&bibsort=author" class="numURL">19</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=20&bibsort=author" class="numURL">20</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=21&bibsort=author" class="numURL">21</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=22&bibsort=author" class="numURL">22</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=23&bibsort=author" class="numURL">23</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=24&bibsort=author" class="numURL">24</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=25&bibsort=author" class="numURL">25</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=26&bibsort=author" class="numURL">26</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=27&bibsort=author" class="numURL">27</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=28&bibsort=author" class="numURL">28</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=29&bibsort=author" class="numURL">29</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=30&bibsort=author" class="numURL">30</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=31&bibsort=author" class="numURL">31</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=32&bibsort=author" class="numURL">32</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=33&bibsort=author" class="numURL">33</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=34&bibsort=author" class="numURL">34</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=35&bibsort=author" class="numURL">35</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=36&bibsort=author" class="numURL">36</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=37&bibsort=author" class="numURL">37</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=38&bibsort=author" class="numURL">38</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=39&bibsort=author" class="numURL">39</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=40&bibsort=author" class="numURL">40</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=41&bibsort=author" class="numURL">41</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=42&bibsort=author" class="numURL">42</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=43&bibsort=author" class="numURL">43</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=44&bibsort=author" class="numURL">44</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=45&bibsort=author" class="numURL">45</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=46&bibsort=author" class="numURL">46</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=47&bibsort=author" class="numURL">47</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=48&bibsort=author" class="numURL">48</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=49&bibsort=author" class="numURL">49</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=50&bibsort=author" class="numURL">50</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=51&bibsort=author" class="numURL">51</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=52&bibsort=author" class="numURL">52</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=53&bibsort=author" class="numURL">53</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=54&bibsort=author" class="numURL">54</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=55&bibsort=author" class="numURL">55</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=56&bibsort=author" class="numURL">56</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=57&bibsort=author" class="numURL">57</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=58&bibsort=author" class="numURL">58</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=59&bibsort=author" class="numURL">59</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=60&bibsort=author" class="numURL">60</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=61&bibsort=author" class="numURL">61</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=62&bibsort=author" class="numURL">62</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=63&bibsort=author" class="numURL">63</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=64&bibsort=author" class="numURL">64</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=65&bibsort=author" class="numURL">65</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=66&bibsort=author" class="numURL">66</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=67&bibsort=author" class="numURL">67</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=68&bibsort=author" class="numURL">68</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=69&bibsort=author" class="numURL">69</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=70&bibsort=author" class="numURL">70</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=71&bibsort=author" class="numURL">71</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=72&bibsort=author" class="numURL">72</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=73&bibsort=author" class="numURL">73</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=74&bibsort=author" class="numURL">74</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=75&bibsort=author" class="numURL">75</a> | <a href="bibliography2.html?pageID=76&bibsort=author" class="numURL">76</a>"
 page="17"
 iatatest=""
 bibVar_LastIndex="680"
 searchString1="token = ''"
 HTML POST Argument Count 0
 HTML POST Argument List 
 URL Path Argument Count 2
 URL Path Argument List bibsort="author"
 pageID="17"
 CGI AUTH_TYPE 
 CGI CONTENT_LENGTH 
 CGI CONTENT_TYPE 
 CGI GATEWAY_INTERFACE CGI/1.1
 CGI HTTP_ACCEPT */*
 CGI HTTP_REFERER 
 CGI HTTP_USER_AGENT Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
 CGI PATH_INFO 
 CGI QUERY_STRING bibsort=author&pageID=17
 CGI REMOTE_ADDR 3.139.108.140
 CGI REMOTE_HOST 
 CGI REMOTE_IDENT 
 CGI REMOTE_USER 
 CGI REQUEST_METHOD GET
 CGI SCRIPT_NAME /bibliography2.html
 CGI SERVER_PORT 80
 CGI SERVER_PROTOCOL 
 CGI SERVER_NAME dev.accudynetest.com
 CGI SERVER_SOFTWARE MGI Apache